The Controversy over Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Revisited

Nekane Balluerka, Juana Gómez, Dolores M. Hidalgo
{"title":"The Controversy over Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Revisited","authors":"Nekane Balluerka, Juana Gómez, Dolores M. Hidalgo","doi":"10.1027/1614-1881.1.2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is one of the most widely used methods for testing hypotheses in psychological research. However, it has remained shrouded in controversy throughout the almost seventy years of its existence. The present article reviews both the main criticisms of the method as well as the alternatives which have been put forward to complement or replace it. It focuses basically on those alternatives whose use is recommended by the Task Force on Statistical Inference (TFSI) of the APA (Wilkinson and TFSI, 1999) in the interests of improving the working methods of researchers with respect to statistical analysis and data interpretation. In addition, the arguments used to reject each of the criticisms levelled against NHST are reviewed and the main problems with each of the alternatives are pointed out. It is concluded that rigorous research activity requires use of NHST in the appropriate context, the complementary use of other methods which provide information about as...","PeriodicalId":18476,"journal":{"name":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","volume":"49 1","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1027/1614-1881.1.2.55","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.1.2.55","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Abstract. Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is one of the most widely used methods for testing hypotheses in psychological research. However, it has remained shrouded in controversy throughout the almost seventy years of its existence. The present article reviews both the main criticisms of the method as well as the alternatives which have been put forward to complement or replace it. It focuses basically on those alternatives whose use is recommended by the Task Force on Statistical Inference (TFSI) of the APA (Wilkinson and TFSI, 1999) in the interests of improving the working methods of researchers with respect to statistical analysis and data interpretation. In addition, the arguments used to reject each of the criticisms levelled against NHST are reviewed and the main problems with each of the alternatives are pointed out. It is concluded that rigorous research activity requires use of NHST in the appropriate context, the complementary use of other methods which provide information about as...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零假设显著性检验之争再论
摘要零假设显著性检验(NHST)是心理学研究中应用最广泛的假设检验方法之一。然而,在其存在的近七十年中,它一直笼罩在争议之中。本文回顾了对该方法的主要批评以及为补充或取代该方法而提出的替代方案。它主要关注那些由APA的统计推断工作组(TFSI)推荐使用的替代方法(Wilkinson and TFSI, 1999),以改善研究人员在统计分析和数据解释方面的工作方法。此外,用于拒绝对NHST提出的每个批评的论据进行了审查,并指出了每个替代方案的主要问题。结论是,严谨的研究活动需要在适当的背景下使用NHST,补充使用其他方法来提供关于…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Opaque prior distributions in Bayesian latent variable models Incorporating machine learning into factor mixture modeling: Identification of covariate interactions to explain population heterogeneity Bias and sensitivity analyses for linear front-door models Scaling metric measurement invariance models Extracting vocal characteristics and calculating vocal synchrony using Praat and R: A tutorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1