Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research

C. Atzmüller, Peter M Steiner
{"title":"Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research","authors":"C. Atzmüller, Peter M Steiner","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/A000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vignette studies use short descriptions of situations or persons (vignettes) that are usually shown to respondents within surveys in order to elicit their judgments about these scenarios. By systematically varying the levels of theoretically important vignette characteristics a large population of different vignettes is typically available – too large to be presented to each respondent. Therefore, each respondent gets only a subset of vignettes. These subsets may either be randomly selected in following the tradition of the factorial survey or systematically selected according to an experimental design. We show that these strategies in selecting vignette sets have strong implications for the analysis and interpretation of vignette data. Random selection strategies result in a random confounding of effects and heavily rely on the assumption of no interaction effects. In contrast, experimental strategies systematically confound interaction effects with main or set effects, thereby preserving a meaningful in...","PeriodicalId":18476,"journal":{"name":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"128-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"655","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 655

Abstract

Vignette studies use short descriptions of situations or persons (vignettes) that are usually shown to respondents within surveys in order to elicit their judgments about these scenarios. By systematically varying the levels of theoretically important vignette characteristics a large population of different vignettes is typically available – too large to be presented to each respondent. Therefore, each respondent gets only a subset of vignettes. These subsets may either be randomly selected in following the tradition of the factorial survey or systematically selected according to an experimental design. We show that these strategies in selecting vignette sets have strong implications for the analysis and interpretation of vignette data. Random selection strategies result in a random confounding of effects and heavily rely on the assumption of no interaction effects. In contrast, experimental strategies systematically confound interaction effects with main or set effects, thereby preserving a meaningful in...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查研究中的实验小插曲研究
小插曲研究使用场景或人物的简短描述(小插曲),通常在调查中显示给受访者,以引出他们对这些场景的判断。通过系统地改变理论上重要的小插曲特征的水平,大量不同的小插曲通常是可用的-太大而无法呈现给每个受访者。因此,每个被调查者只能得到一个小插曲的子集。这些子集可以按照析因调查的传统随机选择,也可以根据实验设计系统选择。我们表明,这些策略在选择小插曲集有很强的影响小插曲数据的分析和解释。随机选择策略导致效应的随机混淆,并且严重依赖于没有相互作用效应的假设。相比之下,实验策略系统地将相互作用效应与主效应或集合效应混淆,从而保留了一个有意义的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Opaque prior distributions in Bayesian latent variable models Incorporating machine learning into factor mixture modeling: Identification of covariate interactions to explain population heterogeneity Bias and sensitivity analyses for linear front-door models Scaling metric measurement invariance models Extracting vocal characteristics and calculating vocal synchrony using Praat and R: A tutorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1