Ancient "Etymology" and Tibullus : on the Classification of "Etymologies" and on "Etymological Markers"

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Cambridge Classical Journal Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0068673500002030
F. Cairns
{"title":"Ancient \"Etymology\" and Tibullus : on the Classification of \"Etymologies\" and on \"Etymological Markers\"","authors":"F. Cairns","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500002030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ancient ‘etymology’ is now such a well-established modern scholarly interest that a paper about it need no longer be prefaced by an account of its commonest forms or by a justification of its importance, especially in poetry – and that despite the pseudo-etymological nature of many ancient etymologies. For such matters it is sufficient to refer to what have already become the standard works on ancient etymologies and etymologising. If further explanation of the high intellectual status accorded by antiquity to etymologising seems necessary, it can be provided economically by reference to those ancient philosophical theories of language, e.g. that of the Stoics, which held that words are related to the reality (φύσις) of the things which they name, and to the close links which surviving ancient etymological treatises assert between etymology (i.e. derivations) and ‘semantics’ (i.e. meaning). The etymologies most familiar to older classical scholarship are those revolving around proper names; but even before the recent upsurge of interest in ancient etymology there was some awareness of the additional potential for common nouns, verbs and adjectives to be etymologised.","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"24-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500002030","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500002030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Ancient ‘etymology’ is now such a well-established modern scholarly interest that a paper about it need no longer be prefaced by an account of its commonest forms or by a justification of its importance, especially in poetry – and that despite the pseudo-etymological nature of many ancient etymologies. For such matters it is sufficient to refer to what have already become the standard works on ancient etymologies and etymologising. If further explanation of the high intellectual status accorded by antiquity to etymologising seems necessary, it can be provided economically by reference to those ancient philosophical theories of language, e.g. that of the Stoics, which held that words are related to the reality (φύσις) of the things which they name, and to the close links which surviving ancient etymological treatises assert between etymology (i.e. derivations) and ‘semantics’ (i.e. meaning). The etymologies most familiar to older classical scholarship are those revolving around proper names; but even before the recent upsurge of interest in ancient etymology there was some awareness of the additional potential for common nouns, verbs and adjectives to be etymologised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古代“词源”与提布洛斯:论“词源”的分类与“词源标记”
古代“词源学”现在是一个非常完善的现代学术兴趣,一篇关于它的论文不需要再以它最常见的形式或其重要性的理由开头,特别是在诗歌中——尽管许多古代词源学具有伪词源学的性质。对于这些问题,参考已经成为古代词源学和词源学标准的著作就足够了。如果有必要进一步说明古代对词源学的高度重视,那么可以从经济的角度来看,参考古代的语言哲学理论,例如斯多葛学派的理论,他们认为词语与他们所命名的事物的实在性(φ σις)有关,以及现存的古代词源学论文所主张的词源学(即衍生)与语义学(即意义)之间的密切联系。古代古典学者最熟悉的词源学是那些围绕专有名称的词源学;但即使在最近对古代词源学的兴趣高涨之前,人们就已经意识到,普通名词、动词和形容词的词源学还有其他的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty. THE VIEW FROM THE MOUNTAIN (OROSKOPIA) IN GREEK AND LATIN LITERATURE TWO NOTES ON DARIUS III FOOLS RUSH IN: SEX, ‘THE MEAN’ AND EPICUREANISM IN HORACE, SATIRES 1.2 TALISMANIC PRACTICE AT LEFKANDI: TRINKETS, BURIALS AND BELIEF IN THE EARLY IRON AGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1