Do financial incentives increase treatment adherence in people with severe mental illness? A systematic review

A. Burton, Stamatina Marougka, S. Priebe
{"title":"Do financial incentives increase treatment adherence in people with severe mental illness? A systematic review","authors":"A. Burton, Stamatina Marougka, S. Priebe","doi":"10.1017/S1121189X00001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Aim – To identify whether financial or material incentives improve treatment adherence in people with severe mental illness. Method – A systematic review of studies published between 1950 and 2008 was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM, AMED and PsycINFO were searched. Studies were included if a financial or material incentive was offered and if the sample had a severe mental illness. Results – Fourteen articles were identified; three studies on adherence to psychiatric treatment and one on physical exercise. Ten articles used incentives for adherence to substance misuse treatment programmes. In all studies, financial incentives were associated with an increase in adherence; however the effect was not always maintained once the incentive was withdrawn. Conclusion – While existing research suggests that financial incentives may improve treatment adherence in severely mentally ill populations, very few studies focus on psychiatric treatment. Further research may address the long term effectiveness of incentives on adherence in this population. Declaration of Interest: The authors on this paper were supported by funds from the Wellcome Trust. All authors worked on a Wellcome Trust funded qualitative focus group study exploring stakeholder views on offering patients financial incentives to adhere to antipsychotic medication. Priebe is also lead applicant on a National Institute of Health Research (England) (NIHR) awarded grant to conduct a clinical trial on the use of financial incentives to achieve maintenance antipsychotic medication adherence.","PeriodicalId":72946,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","volume":"19 1","pages":"233 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1121189X00001160","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00001160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

SUMMARY Aim – To identify whether financial or material incentives improve treatment adherence in people with severe mental illness. Method – A systematic review of studies published between 1950 and 2008 was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM, AMED and PsycINFO were searched. Studies were included if a financial or material incentive was offered and if the sample had a severe mental illness. Results – Fourteen articles were identified; three studies on adherence to psychiatric treatment and one on physical exercise. Ten articles used incentives for adherence to substance misuse treatment programmes. In all studies, financial incentives were associated with an increase in adherence; however the effect was not always maintained once the incentive was withdrawn. Conclusion – While existing research suggests that financial incentives may improve treatment adherence in severely mentally ill populations, very few studies focus on psychiatric treatment. Further research may address the long term effectiveness of incentives on adherence in this population. Declaration of Interest: The authors on this paper were supported by funds from the Wellcome Trust. All authors worked on a Wellcome Trust funded qualitative focus group study exploring stakeholder views on offering patients financial incentives to adhere to antipsychotic medication. Priebe is also lead applicant on a National Institute of Health Research (England) (NIHR) awarded grant to conduct a clinical trial on the use of financial incentives to achieve maintenance antipsychotic medication adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济激励能提高严重精神疾病患者的治疗依从性吗?系统回顾
目的:确定经济或物质激励是否能提高严重精神疾病患者的治疗依从性。方法:对1950年至2008年间发表的研究进行了系统回顾。检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、EBM、AMED和PsycINFO。如果提供了经济或物质激励,并且样本患有严重的精神疾病,则研究被纳入其中。结果-确定了14篇文章;三个关于坚持精神治疗的研究一个关于体育锻炼。10篇文章采用奖励措施鼓励遵守药物滥用治疗方案。在所有的研究中,财政激励与依从性的增加有关;然而,一旦奖励被取消,这种效果并不总是保持不变。结论:虽然现有的研究表明,经济激励可能会提高严重精神疾病患者的治疗依从性,但很少有研究关注精神疾病的治疗。进一步的研究可能会解决在这一人群中激励依从性的长期有效性。利益声明:本文作者由惠康信托基金资助。所有作者都参与了一项由威康信托基金资助的定性焦点小组研究,探讨利益相关者对为坚持服用抗精神病药物的患者提供经济激励的看法。Priebe还是英国国家健康研究所(NIHR)的首席申请人,该研究所授予该机构一项临床试验的资金奖励,以实现抗精神病药物依从性的维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduzione Arsenic accumulation in edible vegetables and health risk reduction by groundwater treatment using an adsorption process. Single-cell imaging of normal and malignant cell engraftment into optically clear prkdc-null SCID zebrafish. Acute in-patient care in modern, community-based mental health services. Where and how? Is locating acute wards in the general hospital an essential element in psychiatric reform? The U.K. experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1