Diagnosing psychotic disorders: validity, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DIP). Italian version

A. Rossi, V. Morgan, F. Amaddeo, M. Sandri, L. Grigoletti, F. Maggioni, A. Ferro, Elena Rigon, V. Donisi, Valeria Vailati Venturi, F. Goria, I. Skre, M. Tansella, A. Jablensky
{"title":"Diagnosing psychotic disorders: validity, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DIP). Italian version","authors":"A. Rossi, V. Morgan, F. Amaddeo, M. Sandri, L. Grigoletti, F. Maggioni, A. Ferro, Elena Rigon, V. Donisi, Valeria Vailati Venturi, F. Goria, I. Skre, M. Tansella, A. Jablensky","doi":"10.1017/S1121189X00001585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims – The Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses (DIP) is a comprehensive interview schedule for psychotic disorders, linked to the OPCRIT diagnostic algorithm, bridging the gap between fully structured, lay-administered schedules and semistructured, psychiatrist-administered interviews. Here we describe the validity, reliability and applications of the Italian version of the DIP. Methods – The interview was translated into Italian and its content validity tested by back translation. Sixty patients, drawn from among those who contacted the South-Verona Community Mental Health Service, were included in the study. Each patient was first assessed independently by two raters, one of whom conducted the interview, while the other assumed the role of observer. Subsequently (median: 89 days), 44 of these patients were re-interviewed by a third rater, who made an independent assessment. Diagnostic validity was assessed in 18 cases, interviewed with the DIP and using the SCAN as ‘gold standard. Results – The mean duration of the interview was 37 minutes for the inter-rater interviews and 39 minutes for the retest interviews. Good to excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for both ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnoses, while in the test-retest reliability pairwise agreement was high for half of the items. Diagnostic validity was good, with twelve out of the 18 DIP-OPCRIT diagnoses (67%) matching the SCAN diagnosis. Conclusions – Overall, the results support the reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the DIP. The Italian version will be useful both in routine practice to establish standard reference diagnoses of psychosis and in the research field, where it can be used by academic researchers in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.","PeriodicalId":72946,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","volume":"19 1","pages":"33 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1121189X00001585","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00001585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aims – The Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses (DIP) is a comprehensive interview schedule for psychotic disorders, linked to the OPCRIT diagnostic algorithm, bridging the gap between fully structured, lay-administered schedules and semistructured, psychiatrist-administered interviews. Here we describe the validity, reliability and applications of the Italian version of the DIP. Methods – The interview was translated into Italian and its content validity tested by back translation. Sixty patients, drawn from among those who contacted the South-Verona Community Mental Health Service, were included in the study. Each patient was first assessed independently by two raters, one of whom conducted the interview, while the other assumed the role of observer. Subsequently (median: 89 days), 44 of these patients were re-interviewed by a third rater, who made an independent assessment. Diagnostic validity was assessed in 18 cases, interviewed with the DIP and using the SCAN as ‘gold standard. Results – The mean duration of the interview was 37 minutes for the inter-rater interviews and 39 minutes for the retest interviews. Good to excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for both ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnoses, while in the test-retest reliability pairwise agreement was high for half of the items. Diagnostic validity was good, with twelve out of the 18 DIP-OPCRIT diagnoses (67%) matching the SCAN diagnosis. Conclusions – Overall, the results support the reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the DIP. The Italian version will be useful both in routine practice to establish standard reference diagnoses of psychosis and in the research field, where it can be used by academic researchers in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神障碍诊断:精神病诊断访谈(DIP)的效度、信度及应用。意大利版
目的:精神病诊断访谈(DIP)是一份针对精神疾病的综合访谈时间表,与OPCRIT诊断算法相关联,弥合了完全结构化、非专业人员管理的时间表与半结构化、精神科医生管理的访谈之间的差距。本文介绍了意大利版DIP的有效性、可靠性及其应用。方法:将访谈内容翻译成意大利语,采用反译法对访谈内容进行效度检验。从与南维罗纳社区精神卫生服务机构联系的人中选出60名患者参与了这项研究。每位患者首先由两名评分员独立评估,其中一人进行访谈,而另一人担任观察员的角色。随后(中位数:89天),其中44名患者再次接受第三方的访谈,并进行独立评估。对18例病例进行诊断有效性评估,采用DIP访谈并使用SCAN作为“金标准”。结果-内部面试的平均面试时间为37分钟,复试面试的平均面试时间为39分钟。在ICD-10和DSM-IV的诊断中,显示了良好到优异的量表间信度,而在测试-重测中,一半的项目的双信度一致性很高。诊断效度良好,18个DIP-OPCRIT诊断中有12个(67%)与SCAN诊断相匹配。结论-总体而言,结果支持DIP意大利语翻译的可靠性和有效性。意大利语版将有助于在日常实践中建立精神病的标准参考诊断,并在研究领域,它可以被学术研究人员用于临床试验和流行病学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduzione Arsenic accumulation in edible vegetables and health risk reduction by groundwater treatment using an adsorption process. Single-cell imaging of normal and malignant cell engraftment into optically clear prkdc-null SCID zebrafish. Acute in-patient care in modern, community-based mental health services. Where and how? Is locating acute wards in the general hospital an essential element in psychiatric reform? The U.K. experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1