How cool is floating PV? A state-of-the-art review of floating PV's potential gain and computational fluid dynamics modeling to find its root cause

IF 1.9 Q3 PHYSICS, APPLIED EPJ Photovoltaics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/epjpv/2023015
Gofran Chowdhury, M. Haggag, J. Poortmans
{"title":"How cool is floating PV? A state-of-the-art review of floating PV's potential gain and computational fluid dynamics modeling to find its root cause","authors":"Gofran Chowdhury, M. Haggag, J. Poortmans","doi":"10.1051/epjpv/2023015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The noticeable rise in electricity demand, environmental concerns, and the intense land burden has led to installing PV systems on water bodies to create floating photovoltaic (FPV). Of all market niches, FPV is the one developing the fastest. Along with some of its well-documented merits comes a claim that FPV modules operate at a lower temperature than their ground-mounted counterparts (GPVs). This claim is essential due to the performance loss of PV modules at high operating temperatures. Some literature claims that FPVs are so well-cooled that they maintain around 10% higher efficiencies. However, this cooling is poorly quantified, and the root cause remains unclear in the industry. In this paper, an extensive review of all the latest published literature and white paper advertisements was analyzed. The gains in energy yield coming from different root causes range from 0.11% to 31.29%! This proves the point of lack of clarity of potential gain of FPV. The paper then analyses four possible explanations for this cooling effect and its root causes. The FPV performance parameters are isolated and systematically investigated through physics-based finite element modeling. The impacts of wind velocity, wind direction, water temperature, relative humidity, air temperature, proximity to water, tilt angle, and others are evaluated and explained. The outcomes dictate that FPV is cooled largely through wind convection. But the increase in efficiency is below the anticipated values, ranging from 0.5% to 3%.","PeriodicalId":42768,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Photovoltaics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2023015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The noticeable rise in electricity demand, environmental concerns, and the intense land burden has led to installing PV systems on water bodies to create floating photovoltaic (FPV). Of all market niches, FPV is the one developing the fastest. Along with some of its well-documented merits comes a claim that FPV modules operate at a lower temperature than their ground-mounted counterparts (GPVs). This claim is essential due to the performance loss of PV modules at high operating temperatures. Some literature claims that FPVs are so well-cooled that they maintain around 10% higher efficiencies. However, this cooling is poorly quantified, and the root cause remains unclear in the industry. In this paper, an extensive review of all the latest published literature and white paper advertisements was analyzed. The gains in energy yield coming from different root causes range from 0.11% to 31.29%! This proves the point of lack of clarity of potential gain of FPV. The paper then analyses four possible explanations for this cooling effect and its root causes. The FPV performance parameters are isolated and systematically investigated through physics-based finite element modeling. The impacts of wind velocity, wind direction, water temperature, relative humidity, air temperature, proximity to water, tilt angle, and others are evaluated and explained. The outcomes dictate that FPV is cooled largely through wind convection. But the increase in efficiency is below the anticipated values, ranging from 0.5% to 3%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浮动PV有多酷?浮式光伏的潜在增益和计算流体动力学建模的最新进展,以找到其根本原因
电力需求的显著增长、环境问题和土地负担的增加,导致在水体上安装光伏系统,以制造浮动光伏(FPV)。在所有细分市场中,FPV是发展最快的一个。除了一些有充分证据证明的优点外,还有一种说法,即FPV模块的工作温度比地面安装的同类组件(gpv)要低。由于光伏组件在高温下的性能损失,这一主张是必不可少的。一些文献声称,fpv的冷却效果非常好,可以使效率提高10%左右。然而,这种降温的量化很差,其根本原因在业内仍不清楚。在本文中,广泛回顾了所有最新发表的文献和白皮书广告进行了分析。来自不同根本原因的能源产量收益从0.11%到31.29%不等!这证明了FPV的潜在增益不够清晰。然后,本文分析了这种降温效应的四种可能解释及其根本原因。通过基于物理的有限元建模,分离和系统地研究了FPV的性能参数。对风速、风向、水温、相对湿度、空气温度、靠近水、倾斜角度等因素的影响进行了评估和解释。结果表明,FPV主要通过风对流冷却。但是,效率的提高低于预期值,从0.5%到3%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Photovoltaics
EPJ Photovoltaics PHYSICS, APPLIED-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epitaxy and characterization of InP/InGaAs tandem solar cells grown by MOVPE on InP and Si substrates Effect of the cooling rate on encapsulant's crystallinity and optical properties, and photovoltaic modules' lifetime Insights into circular material and waste flows from c-Si PV industry A direct measure of positive feedback loop-gain due to reverse bias damage in thin-film solar cells using lock-in thermography Combining circularity and environmental metrics to assess material flows of PV silicon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1