Characterization of sensory perceptions elicited by white wine spiked with different aroma, taste and mouth-feel active molecules

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602139
Guilherme Vitorino, M. Mota, M. Malfeito-Ferreira
{"title":"Characterization of sensory perceptions elicited by white wine spiked with different aroma, taste and mouth-feel active molecules","authors":"Guilherme Vitorino, M. Mota, M. Malfeito-Ferreira","doi":"10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work was aimed at understanding the sensory responses induced by dry white wine modified with increasing concentrations of different sensory active molecules. The tasting panel was composed by 34 trained subjects characterized according to gender, smoking habits, 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status, and sensitivity to tartaric acid, tannic acid and sucrose. Additional taste/mouthfeel responsiveness was evaluated in a basal white wine added of tartaric acid, tannic acid and sucrose. The addition of a fruity odorant mixture to the base white wine enabled the assessment of orthonasal aroma and taste intensities (sweetness, sourness, saltiness). The diversity of taste/mouthfeel responsiveness in water or wine enabled to group individuals as high or low sensitives. Likewise, the tasting panel showed two groups responding differently to aroma and flavor. Both high and low aroma sensitivity individuals showed equal (p>0.05) and congruent response to in-mouth sweet flavor perception. Moreover, the high smell sensitive group was less sensitive to sourness and saltiness than the low smell sensitives for the spiked wines across all flavor concentrations. Differences in PROP taster status and sensitivity to other tastants in water solutions were not correlated with the taste/mouthfeel perceptions in wine. The individuals most sensitive to sucrose in wine taste showed higher response to the fruity aroma. In conclusion, taste, mouthfeel and flavor perceptions showed a high variability among individuals evidencing the advantage of grouping tasters with different chemosensory sensitivities to understand cross-modal sensory interactions.","PeriodicalId":54244,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present work was aimed at understanding the sensory responses induced by dry white wine modified with increasing concentrations of different sensory active molecules. The tasting panel was composed by 34 trained subjects characterized according to gender, smoking habits, 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status, and sensitivity to tartaric acid, tannic acid and sucrose. Additional taste/mouthfeel responsiveness was evaluated in a basal white wine added of tartaric acid, tannic acid and sucrose. The addition of a fruity odorant mixture to the base white wine enabled the assessment of orthonasal aroma and taste intensities (sweetness, sourness, saltiness). The diversity of taste/mouthfeel responsiveness in water or wine enabled to group individuals as high or low sensitives. Likewise, the tasting panel showed two groups responding differently to aroma and flavor. Both high and low aroma sensitivity individuals showed equal (p>0.05) and congruent response to in-mouth sweet flavor perception. Moreover, the high smell sensitive group was less sensitive to sourness and saltiness than the low smell sensitives for the spiked wines across all flavor concentrations. Differences in PROP taster status and sensitivity to other tastants in water solutions were not correlated with the taste/mouthfeel perceptions in wine. The individuals most sensitive to sucrose in wine taste showed higher response to the fruity aroma. In conclusion, taste, mouthfeel and flavor perceptions showed a high variability among individuals evidencing the advantage of grouping tasters with different chemosensory sensitivities to understand cross-modal sensory interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加入不同香气、味道和口感活性分子的白葡萄酒所引起的感官知觉特征
本研究旨在了解不同感觉活性分子浓度的干白葡萄酒所引起的感官反应。品鉴小组由34名受过训练的受试者组成,根据性别、吸烟习惯、6-n-丙基硫尿嘧啶(PROP)品鉴器状态以及对酒石酸、单宁酸和蔗糖的敏感性进行分类。在添加酒石酸、单宁酸和蔗糖的基础白葡萄酒中评估了额外的味道/口感反应性。在基础白葡萄酒中加入一种水果气味混合物,可以评估鼻香气和味道强度(甜味、酸味、咸味)。对水或葡萄酒的味觉/口感反应的多样性可以将个体分为高敏感或低敏感。同样,品尝小组显示,两组人对香气和味道的反应不同。高敏感度个体和低敏感度个体对入口甜味感知的反应基本一致(p < 0.05)。此外,在所有风味浓度下,高嗅觉敏感组对酸味和咸味的敏感度都低于低嗅觉敏感组。PROP品尝者状态的差异和对水溶液中其他品尝剂的敏感性与葡萄酒的味道/口感感知无关。对蔗糖最敏感的个体对果香的反应更高。总之,味觉、口感和风味感知在个体之间表现出高度的可变性,这证明了将具有不同化学感觉敏感性的品尝者分组以理解跨模态感官相互作用的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
12.50%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola (Journal of Viticulture and Enology) is an international journal that publishes original articles, research notes and review articles, written in Portuguese or in English, on the various fields of the science and technology of vine and wine: Viticulture, Enology and Vitivinicultural economy.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring of mycotoxins and pesticides in winemaking Contributo para a caracterização de vinhos de oito castas portuguesas minoritárias Effect of drought on aquaporin expression in grafted and ungrafted grapevine cultivars Chitosan application towards the improvement of grapevine performance and wine quality Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation as strategy to mitigate copper toxicity in young field-grown vines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1