Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty of the stiffness modulus: test case of indirect tensile on cylindrical specimens

Hicham Mezouara, L. Dlimi, Abdelouahhab Salih, Mohamed Afechcar, Houcine Zniker
{"title":"Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty of the stiffness modulus: test case of indirect tensile on cylindrical specimens","authors":"Hicham Mezouara, L. Dlimi, Abdelouahhab Salih, Mohamed Afechcar, Houcine Zniker","doi":"10.1051/IJMQE/2021006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study treats the measurement uncertainties that we can find in the stiffness modulus of the bituminous test. We present all the sensors installed on rigidity modulus measurement chains and also their uncertainty ranges. Several parameters influence the rigidity module's value, such as the parameters related to experimental conditions, and others are rather connected to the equipment's specification, which are the speed, the loading level, the temperature, the tested sample dimension, and the data acquisition, etc. All these factors have a great influence on the value of the modulus of rigidity. To qualify the uncertainty factors, we used two approaches: the first one is made by following the method described by the GUM (Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement), the second approach based on the numerical simulation of the Monte Carlo. The two results are then compared for an interval of confidence of 95%. The paper also shows the employment of the basic methods of statistical analysis, such as the Comparing of two variances. Essential concepts in measurement uncertainty have been compiled and the determination of the stiffness module parameters are discussed. It has been demonstrated that the biggest source of error in the stiffness modulus measuring process is the repeatability has a contribution of around 45.23%.","PeriodicalId":38371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/IJMQE/2021006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study treats the measurement uncertainties that we can find in the stiffness modulus of the bituminous test. We present all the sensors installed on rigidity modulus measurement chains and also their uncertainty ranges. Several parameters influence the rigidity module's value, such as the parameters related to experimental conditions, and others are rather connected to the equipment's specification, which are the speed, the loading level, the temperature, the tested sample dimension, and the data acquisition, etc. All these factors have a great influence on the value of the modulus of rigidity. To qualify the uncertainty factors, we used two approaches: the first one is made by following the method described by the GUM (Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement), the second approach based on the numerical simulation of the Monte Carlo. The two results are then compared for an interval of confidence of 95%. The paper also shows the employment of the basic methods of statistical analysis, such as the Comparing of two variances. Essential concepts in measurement uncertainty have been compiled and the determination of the stiffness module parameters are discussed. It has been demonstrated that the biggest source of error in the stiffness modulus measuring process is the repeatability has a contribution of around 45.23%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刚度模量测量不确定度的评定:圆柱试样间接拉伸试验案例
本文对沥青刚度模量试验中存在的测量不确定性进行了研究。给出了安装在刚性模量测量链上的所有传感器及其不确定度范围。影响刚度模块值的参数有几个,如与实验条件有关的参数,还有一些与设备规格有关的参数,如速度、加载水平、温度、被测样品尺寸、数据采集等。这些因素对刚性模量的取值有很大的影响。为了限定不确定因素,我们使用了两种方法:第一种方法是根据GUM(测量不确定度表达指南)所描述的方法进行的,第二种方法是基于蒙特卡罗的数值模拟。然后在95%的置信区间内比较这两个结果。本文还介绍了两方差比较等统计分析基本方法的应用。编制了测量不确定度的基本概念,讨论了刚度模块参数的确定。结果表明,在刚度模量测量过程中,最大的误差来源是重复性,其贡献率约为45.23%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of influence of grinding wheel and cutting parameters on surface roughness and surface hardening when relieving grinding the gear milling teeth surface based on the Archimedes' spiral Analysis and treatment of current unbalance abnormal situation of 750 kV double-circuit parallel transmission line Characterizing a linear pyrometer at the National Metrology Institute of South Africa Estimation of parallelism measurement uncertainty according to the Geometrical Product Specifications standard using coordinate measuring machine First study on harvesting electromagnetic noise energy generated by the frequency converters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1