Information and its value to health workers in rural Uganda: a qualitative perspective*

Maria G. N. Musoke
{"title":"Information and its value to health workers in rural Uganda: a qualitative perspective*","authors":"Maria G. N. Musoke","doi":"10.1046/J.1365-2532.2000.00289.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted in 1998/99 to investigate the accessibility and use of information by health workers in rural Uganda. Data were collected qualitatively using semi-structured interviews. As a qualitative study, it focused in-depth on a relatively small sample of health workers selected purposefully. Different categories of health workers were interviewed. \n \n \n \nData were analysed using a grounded theory approach. In this paper, two main categories that emerged from the data will be discussed, namely: value of information and constraints. Information was valuable in clinical work, information dissemination, decision making, administration and detection. Constraints to effective information use included the quality and relevance of the information as well as the difficulties of sometimes putting theory into practice. Finally, the concepts that emerged from the analysis of the use of information pointed directly to the information needs of the health workers studied, which shows that information was valuable in meeting those needs. Some implications of the study and areas for further research are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":73211,"journal":{"name":"Health libraries review","volume":"17 1","pages":"194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health libraries review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2532.2000.00289.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A study was conducted in 1998/99 to investigate the accessibility and use of information by health workers in rural Uganda. Data were collected qualitatively using semi-structured interviews. As a qualitative study, it focused in-depth on a relatively small sample of health workers selected purposefully. Different categories of health workers were interviewed. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. In this paper, two main categories that emerged from the data will be discussed, namely: value of information and constraints. Information was valuable in clinical work, information dissemination, decision making, administration and detection. Constraints to effective information use included the quality and relevance of the information as well as the difficulties of sometimes putting theory into practice. Finally, the concepts that emerged from the analysis of the use of information pointed directly to the information needs of the health workers studied, which shows that information was valuable in meeting those needs. Some implications of the study and areas for further research are highlighted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息及其对乌干达农村卫生工作者的价值:定性观点*
1998/99年进行了一项研究,调查乌干达农村保健工作者获取和使用信息的情况。采用半结构化访谈对数据进行定性收集。作为一项定性研究,它深入关注有目的地选择的相对较小的卫生工作者样本。对不同类别的卫生工作者进行了访谈。数据是用扎根理论的方法分析的。在本文中,将讨论从数据中出现的两个主要类别,即:信息的价值和约束。信息在临床工作、信息传播、决策、管理和检测中具有重要价值。有效利用信息的制约因素包括信息的质量和相关性,以及有时难以将理论付诸实践。最后,通过对信息使用情况的分析得出的概念直接指向所研究的保健工作者的信息需求,这表明信息在满足这些需求方面很有价值。强调了本研究的一些意义和进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical journals and effective dissemination of health research Medical history for tomorrow-preserving the record of today The Open University history of medicine CD-ROM The Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London and the history of medicine Why historians of medicine need your help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1