The relevance of local magnetic records when using extreme space weather events as benchmarks

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1051/SWSC/2021018
E. Saiz, C. Cid, Antonio Guerrero
{"title":"The relevance of local magnetic records when using extreme space weather events as benchmarks","authors":"E. Saiz, C. Cid, Antonio Guerrero","doi":"10.1051/SWSC/2021018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Space weather indices introduced for scientific purposes are commonly used to quantify operational nowcast of the geospace state during extreme space weather events. Some indices, such as the Disturbance storm time (Dst) index, have been applied to situations for which they are not originally intended. This raises a question about suitability as a space weather benchmark. In analysing historical records for different magnetometers at low- and mid-latitude, we find periods with longitudinal asymmetry in magnetic response that suggest important signals from individual magnetometers are being averaged out of the Dst record. This asymmetry develops as a double spike in the H-component: one negative in the observatories in the day sector and one positive in the observatories in the night sector. These spikes develop in short-time (about 2 h) and pose a potential hazardous effect for users affected by space weather. The results from historical events have been reinforced with the systematic study of magnetic records during extreme events (Dst ≤ −200 nT and AL ≤ −2000 nT) in the period 1998–2017 from six magnetic observatories at about 40° magnetic latitude. Moreover, we show that the largest asymmetries take place during the early main phase and are recorded in narrow local time sectors. An important outcome of these results is that space weather benchmarks should be based on local records instead of the commonly used global indices. This action improves two important aspects of space weather: the assessment of historical extreme events and that of the needs of users.","PeriodicalId":17034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2021018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Space weather indices introduced for scientific purposes are commonly used to quantify operational nowcast of the geospace state during extreme space weather events. Some indices, such as the Disturbance storm time (Dst) index, have been applied to situations for which they are not originally intended. This raises a question about suitability as a space weather benchmark. In analysing historical records for different magnetometers at low- and mid-latitude, we find periods with longitudinal asymmetry in magnetic response that suggest important signals from individual magnetometers are being averaged out of the Dst record. This asymmetry develops as a double spike in the H-component: one negative in the observatories in the day sector and one positive in the observatories in the night sector. These spikes develop in short-time (about 2 h) and pose a potential hazardous effect for users affected by space weather. The results from historical events have been reinforced with the systematic study of magnetic records during extreme events (Dst ≤ −200 nT and AL ≤ −2000 nT) in the period 1998–2017 from six magnetic observatories at about 40° magnetic latitude. Moreover, we show that the largest asymmetries take place during the early main phase and are recorded in narrow local time sectors. An important outcome of these results is that space weather benchmarks should be based on local records instead of the commonly used global indices. This action improves two important aspects of space weather: the assessment of historical extreme events and that of the needs of users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当使用极端空间天气事件作为基准时,本地磁记录的相关性
为科学目的引入的空间天气指数通常用于量化极端空间天气事件期间地球空间状态的业务临近预报。一些指数,如扰动风暴时间(Dst)指数,已被应用于原本不打算用于的情况。这就提出了一个关于是否适合作为空间天气基准的问题。在分析低纬度和中纬度不同磁力计的历史记录时,我们发现磁响应纵向不对称的时期,这表明来自单个磁力计的重要信号正在从Dst记录中平均出来。这种不对称发展为h分量的双尖峰:一个在白天区域的观测站为负,一个在夜晚区域的观测站为正。这些峰值在短时间内(约2小时)形成,对受空间天气影响的用户构成潜在的危险影响。通过对1998-2017年极端事件(Dst≤- 200 nT和AL≤- 2000 nT)的系统研究,在磁纬40°左右的6个地磁观测站对历史事件的结果进行了进一步的验证。此外,我们表明,最大的不对称发生在早期的主要阶段,并记录在狭窄的当地时间部门。这些结果的一个重要结果是,空间天气基准应以当地记录为基础,而不是常用的全球指数。这一行动改善了空间天气的两个重要方面:对历史极端事件的评估和对用户需求的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (SWSC) is an international multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open access journal which publishes papers on all aspects of space weather and space climate from a broad range of scientific and technical fields including solar physics, space plasma physics, aeronomy, planetology, radio science, geophysics, biology, medicine, astronautics, aeronautics, electrical engineering, meteorology, climatology, mathematics, economy, informatics.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Instrument Observations and Tracking of a Coronal Mass Ejection Front From Low to Middle Corona A Bayesian approach to the drag-based modelling of ICMEs Reconstruction of electron precipitation spectra at the top of the upper atmosphere using 427.8 nm auroral images Karl von Lindener's Sunspot Observations during 1800 – 1827: Another Long-Term Dataset for the Dalton Minimum On the detection of a solar radio burst event occurred on 28 August 2022 and its effect on GNSS signals as observed by ionospheric scintillation monitors distributed over the American sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1