Overview of the past contributions of animal models and their changing place in psychiatry.

W. McKINNEY
{"title":"Overview of the past contributions of animal models and their changing place in psychiatry.","authors":"W. McKINNEY","doi":"10.1053/SCNP.2001.20292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research utilizing animal models has been responsible for major advances in understanding psychiatric disorders. The first data based integrative theories of psychopathology grew largely out of animal research. A variety of animal models that have been developed have been critical in broadening our understanding of human development and in providing empirical support for the importance of early experiences for behavioral and neurobiologic development. The development of many widely used clinical psychopharmacologic agents has depended on the use of animal models. The above examples represent substantive contributions of animal models to investigations of fundamental aspects of psychopathology. There is no \"perfect,\" complete or comprehensive single animal model for any specific psychiatric disorder and contentious debates about the validity and/or usefulness of specific animal models persist. Animal models of diseases in medicine need to be understood in a historical and evolutionary perspective and their advantages as well as limitations recognized. There will likely never be an animal model in any field of medicine that is a perfect fit with the human condition, rather the emphasis in the development and study of disease models in animals needs to be on specific components of the human illness. Neither overextended cross-species comparisons nor unjustified negativism about animal models seems defensible. A major challenge in the continuing development and use of biobehavioral animal models in psychiatry is their relationship to the molecular neurosciences, including genetics, in understanding the mechanisms of mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":79723,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry","volume":"6 1 1","pages":"68-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SCNP.2001.20292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Research utilizing animal models has been responsible for major advances in understanding psychiatric disorders. The first data based integrative theories of psychopathology grew largely out of animal research. A variety of animal models that have been developed have been critical in broadening our understanding of human development and in providing empirical support for the importance of early experiences for behavioral and neurobiologic development. The development of many widely used clinical psychopharmacologic agents has depended on the use of animal models. The above examples represent substantive contributions of animal models to investigations of fundamental aspects of psychopathology. There is no "perfect," complete or comprehensive single animal model for any specific psychiatric disorder and contentious debates about the validity and/or usefulness of specific animal models persist. Animal models of diseases in medicine need to be understood in a historical and evolutionary perspective and their advantages as well as limitations recognized. There will likely never be an animal model in any field of medicine that is a perfect fit with the human condition, rather the emphasis in the development and study of disease models in animals needs to be on specific components of the human illness. Neither overextended cross-species comparisons nor unjustified negativism about animal models seems defensible. A major challenge in the continuing development and use of biobehavioral animal models in psychiatry is their relationship to the molecular neurosciences, including genetics, in understanding the mechanisms of mental disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概述过去动物模型的贡献及其在精神病学中的变化地位。
利用动物模型的研究在理解精神疾病方面取得了重大进展。第一个基于数据的精神病理学综合理论主要来自动物研究。已经开发的各种动物模型对于扩大我们对人类发展的理解以及为早期经历对行为和神经生物学发展的重要性提供经验支持至关重要。许多广泛应用的临床精神药理学药物的开发都依赖于动物模型的使用。上述例子代表了动物模型对精神病理学基本方面研究的实质性贡献。对于任何特定的精神疾病,都没有“完美”、完整或全面的单一动物模型,关于特定动物模型的有效性和/或有用性的争论一直存在。医学疾病的动物模型需要从历史和进化的角度来理解,并认识到它们的优点和局限性。在任何医学领域,可能永远不会有一种动物模型完全符合人类的情况,相反,动物疾病模型的开发和研究的重点需要放在人类疾病的特定组成部分上。无论是过度的跨物种比较,还是对动物模型的无理否定,似乎都站不住脚。在精神病学中继续发展和使用生物行为动物模型的一个主要挑战是它们与分子神经科学(包括遗传学)在理解精神障碍机制方面的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Apathy. The neuropsychology of cancer treatment. Introduction. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive disorders: neuropsychological, pathophysiological, and neuroimaging perspectives. Delirium in the course of cancer treatment. Distinguishing fatigue and depression in patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1