Directional coronary atherectomy: optimal atherectomy trials and new combined strategies with coronary stents.

C. Simonton
{"title":"Directional coronary atherectomy: optimal atherectomy trials and new combined strategies with coronary stents.","authors":"C. Simonton","doi":"10.1053/SIIC.2000.0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) has evolved from its early use as a tool for minimal plaque debulking to its current use of more aggressive lumen enlargement. The trend toward improved lumen results and reduced restenosis following DCA compared to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) was confirmed as a significant improvement in the subsequent Balloon versus Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT). BOAT showed that acute lumen results and late angiographic restenosis could be significantly improved by DCA over PTCA, without any increase in procedural complications or late cardiac events. The role of DCA in conjunction with coronary stents is currently being defined as studies suggest that residual plaque burden after stenting is predictive of late restenosis. The Atherectomy before Multilink Stent Improves Lumen Gain and Clinical Outcomes Study (AMIGO) will help determine whether plaque debulking prior to stenting can reduce restenosis.","PeriodicalId":79534,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC","volume":"5 4 1","pages":"193-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SIIC.2000.0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) has evolved from its early use as a tool for minimal plaque debulking to its current use of more aggressive lumen enlargement. The trend toward improved lumen results and reduced restenosis following DCA compared to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) was confirmed as a significant improvement in the subsequent Balloon versus Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT). BOAT showed that acute lumen results and late angiographic restenosis could be significantly improved by DCA over PTCA, without any increase in procedural complications or late cardiac events. The role of DCA in conjunction with coronary stents is currently being defined as studies suggest that residual plaque burden after stenting is predictive of late restenosis. The Atherectomy before Multilink Stent Improves Lumen Gain and Clinical Outcomes Study (AMIGO) will help determine whether plaque debulking prior to stenting can reduce restenosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定向冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术:最佳动脉粥样硬化切除术试验和新的冠状动脉支架联合策略。
定向冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术(DCA)已经从早期用作最小斑块减积的工具发展到目前更积极地扩大管腔。与经皮冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)相比,在冠状动脉成形术与切除动脉粥样硬化切除术(告诫)试验(告诫)中,DCA后管腔结果改善和再狭窄减少的趋势被证实为随后的球囊与最佳动脉粥样硬化切除术(小船)试验的显著改善。BOAT显示,与PTCA相比,DCA可显著改善急性管腔结果和晚期血管造影再狭窄,未增加手术并发症或晚期心脏事件。DCA与冠状动脉支架联合的作用目前正在被定义,因为研究表明,支架植入后残留斑块负担可预测晚期再狭窄。多链支架前的动脉粥样硬化切除术改善管腔增益和临床结果研究(AMIGO)将有助于确定支架植入前的斑块减容是否可以减少再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RITA. Carotid stenosis: medical treatment Pathophysiological insights from studies of retrieved coronary atherectomy tissue. Morphological analysis of atherosclerotic plaque retrieved by coronary atherectomy. Atherectomy plus stenting: what do we gain?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1