Knowing Climate Change, Embodying Climate Praxis: Experiential Knowledge in Southern Appalachia

J. Rice, B. Burke, N. Heynen
{"title":"Knowing Climate Change, Embodying Climate Praxis: Experiential Knowledge in Southern Appalachia","authors":"J. Rice, B. Burke, N. Heynen","doi":"10.1080/00045608.2014.985628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether used to support or impede action, scientific knowledge is now, more than ever, the primary framework for political discourse on climate change. As a consequence, science has become a hegemonic way of knowing climate change by mainstream climate politics, which not only limits the actors and actions deemed legitimate in climate politics but also silences vulnerable communities and reinforces historical patterns of cultural and political marginalization. To combat this “post-political” condition, we seek to democratize climate knowledge and imagine the possibilities of climate praxis through an engagement with Gramscian political ecology and feminist science studies. This framework emphasizes how antihierarchical and experiential forms of knowledge can work to destabilize technocratic modes of governing. We illustrate the potential of our approach through ethnographic research with people in southern Appalachia whose knowledge of climate change is based in the perceptible effects of weather, landscape change due to exurbanization, and the potential impacts of new migrants they call “climate refugees.” Valuing this knowledge builds more diverse communities of action, resists the extraction of climate change from its complex society–nature entanglements, and reveals the intimate connections between climate justice and distinct cultural lifeways. We argue that only by opening up these new forms of climate praxis, which allow people to take action using the knowledge they already have, can more just socioecological transformations be brought into being.","PeriodicalId":80485,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","volume":"9 1","pages":"253 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00045608.2014.985628","citationCount":"94","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.985628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

Abstract

Whether used to support or impede action, scientific knowledge is now, more than ever, the primary framework for political discourse on climate change. As a consequence, science has become a hegemonic way of knowing climate change by mainstream climate politics, which not only limits the actors and actions deemed legitimate in climate politics but also silences vulnerable communities and reinforces historical patterns of cultural and political marginalization. To combat this “post-political” condition, we seek to democratize climate knowledge and imagine the possibilities of climate praxis through an engagement with Gramscian political ecology and feminist science studies. This framework emphasizes how antihierarchical and experiential forms of knowledge can work to destabilize technocratic modes of governing. We illustrate the potential of our approach through ethnographic research with people in southern Appalachia whose knowledge of climate change is based in the perceptible effects of weather, landscape change due to exurbanization, and the potential impacts of new migrants they call “climate refugees.” Valuing this knowledge builds more diverse communities of action, resists the extraction of climate change from its complex society–nature entanglements, and reveals the intimate connections between climate justice and distinct cultural lifeways. We argue that only by opening up these new forms of climate praxis, which allow people to take action using the knowledge they already have, can more just socioecological transformations be brought into being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识气候变化,体现气候实践:南阿巴拉契亚地区的经验知识
无论是用来支持还是阻碍行动,科学知识现在比以往任何时候都更成为气候变化政治话语的主要框架。因此,科学已经成为主流气候政治了解气候变化的一种霸权方式,这不仅限制了气候政治中被认为合法的行动者和行动,而且还使弱势群体沉默,并加强了文化和政治边缘化的历史模式。为了对抗这种“后政治”状况,我们寻求将气候知识民主化,并通过参与葛兰西政治生态学和女权主义科学研究来想象气候实践的可能性。这一框架强调了反等级和经验形式的知识如何能够破坏技术官僚统治模式的稳定。我们通过对南部阿巴拉契亚地区的人们进行人种学研究来说明我们方法的潜力,这些人对气候变化的认识是基于天气的可感知影响、城市化导致的景观变化,以及他们称之为“气候难民”的新移民的潜在影响。重视这些知识可以建立更多样化的行动社区,抵制从复杂的社会-自然纠缠中提取气候变化,并揭示气候正义与独特的文化生活方式之间的密切联系。我们认为,只有开放这些新的气候实践形式,使人们能够利用已有的知识采取行动,才能实现更公正的社会生态转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying Genetic Etiology in Patients with Intellectual Disability: An Experience in Public Health Services in Northeastern Brazil. Antibiotic Use among Patients Visiting Primary Hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey. Differential Privacy and the Accuracy of County-Level Net Migration Estimates. Two French geographers, father and son: Gaston Gravier (1886–1915) and Jean-François Gravier (1915–2005) Maurice Le Lannou (1906–92)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1