The EU, the United States and Partnership in Development Cooperation: Bridging the Gap?

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Studies Pub Date : 2017-08-03 DOI:10.1080/00220388.2016.1234037
Karen Del Biondo
{"title":"The EU, the United States and Partnership in Development Cooperation: Bridging the Gap?","authors":"Karen Del Biondo","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2016.1234037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates the degree to which EU and United States development policies reflect partnership, meaning that aid is based on negotiations on an equal basis. It finds that, while the EU has traditionally been more focused on partnership than the United States, in recent years the gap is narrowing. The EU is increasingly providing aid based on a security rationale and has become reluctant to give budget support, while the United States is starting to work more with local actors. Changes in public support for aid, the EU’s growing role as a security provider and institutional changes can explain this trend.","PeriodicalId":48295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"1238 - 1252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220388.2016.1234037","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1234037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the degree to which EU and United States development policies reflect partnership, meaning that aid is based on negotiations on an equal basis. It finds that, while the EU has traditionally been more focused on partnership than the United States, in recent years the gap is narrowing. The EU is increasingly providing aid based on a security rationale and has become reluctant to give budget support, while the United States is starting to work more with local actors. Changes in public support for aid, the EU’s growing role as a security provider and institutional changes can explain this trend.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟、美国和发展合作伙伴关系:弥合差距?
本文研究了欧盟和美国的发展政策在多大程度上反映了伙伴关系,这意味着援助是基于平等基础上的谈判。报告发现,虽然欧盟传统上比美国更注重伙伴关系,但近年来差距正在缩小。欧盟越来越多地基于安全理由提供援助,并且不愿提供预算支持,而美国则开始更多地与当地行动者合作。公众对援助支持的变化、欧盟作为安全提供者的作用日益增强,以及制度上的变化,都可以解释这一趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Studies was the first and is one of the best known international journals in the area of development studies. Since its foundation in 1964, it has published many seminal articles on development and opened up new areas of debate. Priority is given to papers which are: • relevant to important current research in development policy, theory and analysis • make a novel and significant contribution to the field • provide critical tests, based on empirical work, of alternative theories, perspectives or schools of thought We invite articles that are interdisciplinary or focused on particular disciplines (e.g. economics, politics, geography, sociology or anthropology), with an expectation that all work is accessible to readers across the social sciences. The editors also welcome surveys of the literature in important fields of development policy. All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous peer review. Given the high level of submissions, a majority of submissions are rejected quickly with reasons.
期刊最新文献
Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico Second Bread: Potato Cultivation and Food Security in Kyrgyzstan Democracy in Hard Places Controlling the Capital: Political Dominance in the Urbanizing World Caste Inequality in Medical Crowdfunding in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1