Stimulus Pull as a Determinant of Individual Differences in Sentence Completion Responses

M. W. Stephens
{"title":"Stimulus Pull as a Determinant of Individual Differences in Sentence Completion Responses","authors":"M. W. Stephens","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Factor analysis of the Incomplete Sentences Blank revealed that item factors correspond not to item content (i.e., the objective referent of the stimulus) but to stimulus pull. Separate analyses were performed for 345 males and for 245 females. For males, one factor consisted almost exclusively of stimuli of negative (i.e., dysphoria) pull, one of stimuli of positive (euphoria) pull, and one of neutral stimuli; stimulus content varied within each factor. For females one factor consisted of a mixture of neutral and positive stimuli and one of negative stimuli; the females' third factor was the only apparently content-determined factor, consisting of stimuli seemingly related to vague anxieties pertinent to family and sex-role relationships. Stimulus pull, then, influences responses more for some subjects than for others, so that individual differences in responses depend on pull characteristics of stimuli used to elicit responses from which inferences are made.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 1","pages":"332-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380258","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Summary Factor analysis of the Incomplete Sentences Blank revealed that item factors correspond not to item content (i.e., the objective referent of the stimulus) but to stimulus pull. Separate analyses were performed for 345 males and for 245 females. For males, one factor consisted almost exclusively of stimuli of negative (i.e., dysphoria) pull, one of stimuli of positive (euphoria) pull, and one of neutral stimuli; stimulus content varied within each factor. For females one factor consisted of a mixture of neutral and positive stimuli and one of negative stimuli; the females' third factor was the only apparently content-determined factor, consisting of stimuli seemingly related to vague anxieties pertinent to family and sex-role relationships. Stimulus pull, then, influences responses more for some subjects than for others, so that individual differences in responses depend on pull characteristics of stimuli used to elicit responses from which inferences are made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激拉力对句子补全反应个体差异的决定作用
对不完整句空白的总结因子分析表明,项目因子不对应于项目内容(即刺激的客观指涉),而对应于刺激拉力。分别对345名男性和245名女性进行了分析。对于男性,一个因素几乎完全由消极(即烦躁不安)拉动刺激,一个积极(欣快)拉动刺激和一个中性刺激组成;刺激内容在每个因子中有所不同。对于女性,一个因素包括中性和积极刺激的混合,一个因素包括消极刺激;女性的第三个因素是唯一明显的内容决定因素,包括似乎与家庭和性别角色关系相关的模糊焦虑有关的刺激。因此,刺激拉力对一些受试者的影响比对另一些受试者的影响更大,因此,反应的个体差异取决于用于引发推断的刺激的拉力特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intra-protocol plate failures: an investigation of Rorschach card meaning. A Semantic Differential investigation of sexually symbolic concepts: Freud and Jung. Psychopathology and seasonal preferences; an aspect of temporal experience. Projective techniques in crisis. Projective fantasy on the CAT and CAT-H.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1