The moderating effects of goals and plans on received support during emerging adults’ conversations with friends

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-02-19 DOI:10.1080/01463373.2023.2181094
Tara G. McManus
{"title":"The moderating effects of goals and plans on received support during emerging adults’ conversations with friends","authors":"Tara G. McManus","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2023.2181094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study builds on the multiple goals approach and planning theory of communication to test how support seekers’ goals and plans for a conversation with a friend moderate the association between received support and conversation satisfaction. The results of the 3-group-comparison experimental design (N = 116; Condition 1: No goals and No plan, n = 38; Condition 2: Goals but No plan, n = 41; Condition 3: Goals and Plan, n = 37), found that although plans were not necessary to improve conversation satisfaction across all types of support and goals, three unique conditions emerged in which plans and goals were important. The results provide partial support for the planning theory of communication, suggest goals and plans may function as expectations or scripts for support seekers, and offer useful recommendations for emerging adults seeking support from friends.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2181094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current study builds on the multiple goals approach and planning theory of communication to test how support seekers’ goals and plans for a conversation with a friend moderate the association between received support and conversation satisfaction. The results of the 3-group-comparison experimental design (N = 116; Condition 1: No goals and No plan, n = 38; Condition 2: Goals but No plan, n = 41; Condition 3: Goals and Plan, n = 37), found that although plans were not necessary to improve conversation satisfaction across all types of support and goals, three unique conditions emerged in which plans and goals were important. The results provide partial support for the planning theory of communication, suggest goals and plans may function as expectations or scripts for support seekers, and offer useful recommendations for emerging adults seeking support from friends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初出期成人与朋友交谈时,目标与计划对获得支持的调节作用
摘要本研究基于多目标方法和沟通计划理论,检验寻求支持者与朋友对话的目标和计划如何调节获得的支持与对话满意度之间的关系。3组比较实验设计结果(N = 116;条件1:无目标,无计划,n = 38;条件2:有目标但没有计划,n = 41;条件3:目标和计划(n = 37)发现,尽管计划不是提高所有类型的支持和目标的谈话满意度所必需的,但出现了三个独特的条件,其中计划和目标很重要。研究结果为沟通计划理论提供了部分支持,表明目标和计划可以作为寻求支持者的期望或脚本,并为新兴成人寻求朋友支持提供了有用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY
COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
“Here’s what you can do to stop the spread”: Frames and mobilizing information in CDC’s social media messages during the COVID-19 pandemic The road from Teamsterville: Locating alternate approaches to the ethnography of communication Parsing communication duration and diagnostic question effects in deception detection Effects or use?: Examining the over-time effects of media use and racial resentment “Thank you for being there for me”: How channel publicness and expression of gratitude shape perceptions of support-seeking messages on social network sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1