The bonding effect of adhesive systems and bulk-fill composites to sound and caries-affected dentine

IF 3.7 4区 材料科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology Pub Date : 2016-01-17 DOI:10.1080/01694243.2015.1095627
N. Tekçe, S. Tuncer, M. Demirci, D. Pashaev
{"title":"The bonding effect of adhesive systems and bulk-fill composites to sound and caries-affected dentine","authors":"N. Tekçe, S. Tuncer, M. Demirci, D. Pashaev","doi":"10.1080/01694243.2015.1095627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: To investigate the influence of adhesive type and increment thickness on shear bond strength of flowable bulk-fill resin composites compared with a flowable conventional resin composite, in both sound and caries-affected dentine. Methods: Shear bond strength was tested in 100 extracted human molars with coronal dentine caries. Half of the teeth were restored with Adper™ Easy Bond and the other half with Adper™ Single Bond Plus. Bonded surfaces were restored with Filtek™ Ultimate Flow and two bulk-fill composites (SDR and X-tra base) (n = 10 teeth for each subgroup). Restorations of 4 mm were performed with incremental or bulk-fill technique. The shear bond was determined and statistically analysed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests (p ≤ 0.05). Dentine–resin interfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: For both adhesives, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained for sound dentine. In sound dentine, the highest bond strength observed with Easy Bond when used in 2-mm increments of SDR. In caries-affected dentine, Single Bond in combination with SDR displayed significantly lower bond strength. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the incremental and bulk-fill groups for molars with sound dentine when the etch-and-rinse adhesive system was used; however, for the self-etch adhesive system, incremental application caused higher bond strength than bulk application.","PeriodicalId":14789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology","volume":"30 1","pages":"171 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01694243.2015.1095627","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1095627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the influence of adhesive type and increment thickness on shear bond strength of flowable bulk-fill resin composites compared with a flowable conventional resin composite, in both sound and caries-affected dentine. Methods: Shear bond strength was tested in 100 extracted human molars with coronal dentine caries. Half of the teeth were restored with Adper™ Easy Bond and the other half with Adper™ Single Bond Plus. Bonded surfaces were restored with Filtek™ Ultimate Flow and two bulk-fill composites (SDR and X-tra base) (n = 10 teeth for each subgroup). Restorations of 4 mm were performed with incremental or bulk-fill technique. The shear bond was determined and statistically analysed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests (p ≤ 0.05). Dentine–resin interfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: For both adhesives, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained for sound dentine. In sound dentine, the highest bond strength observed with Easy Bond when used in 2-mm increments of SDR. In caries-affected dentine, Single Bond in combination with SDR displayed significantly lower bond strength. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the incremental and bulk-fill groups for molars with sound dentine when the etch-and-rinse adhesive system was used; however, for the self-etch adhesive system, incremental application caused higher bond strength than bulk application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘接系统和填充复合材料对健康和龋齿影响的牙本质的粘接效果
摘要目的:研究可流动体填充树脂复合材料与可流动常规树脂复合材料在正常牙本质和患龋牙本质中剪切结合强度的影响,并与胶粘剂类型和增加厚度进行比较。方法:对100颗冠状牙本质龋患者拔牙进行剪切粘结强度测定。一半的牙齿使用Adper™Easy Bond修复,另一半使用Adper™Single Bond Plus修复。使用Filtek™Ultimate Flow和两种填充复合材料(SDR和X-tra基)修复粘接表面(每个亚组n = 10个牙)。采用增量或大块填充技术进行4mm的修复。采用三因素方差分析和Bonferroni多重比较事后检验确定剪切键并进行统计学分析(p≤0.05)。扫描电镜观察牙本质-树脂界面。结果:两种粘接剂中,牙本质完好的粘接剂剪切强度值最高。在健全的牙本质中,当添加2 mm的SDR时,Easy bond的结合强度最高。在受龋病影响的牙本质中,Single Bond与SDR的结合强度明显降低。结论:牙本质完好的磨牙采用蚀刻-冲洗粘结系统时,增量组与填充组的剪切粘结强度无显著差异;然而,对于自蚀刻胶系统,增量应用比批量应用产生更高的粘接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology ( JAST) provides a forum for the basic and applied aspects of adhesion, chemistry of adhesives, coatings and sealants, and structure-properties relationships in adhesive joints and deals with applications of adhesion principles in all areas of technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of PCE anionic charge density on fly ash cementitious system-PCE compatibility Retraction Study on the epoxy bonding properties of polyphenylene sulfide matrix composites reinforced by montmorillonite and basalt fiber Enhancing adhesive interlayer performance with waste tire rubber and amorphous poly alpha olefin compound modified asphalt Structural behaviour of adhesive bonds in 3D printed adherends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1