On Balanced Half-Sample Variance Estimation in Stratified Random Sampling

J. Rao, J. Shao
{"title":"On Balanced Half-Sample Variance Estimation in Stratified Random Sampling","authors":"J. Rao, J. Shao","doi":"10.1080/01621459.1996.10476694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishment surveys based on list frames often use stratified random sampling with a small number of strata, H, and relatively large sample sizes, n_h, within strata. For such surveys, a grouped balanced half-sample (GBHS) method is often used for variance estimation and for construction of confidence intervals on population parameters of interest. In this method the sample in each stratum is first randomly divided into two groups, and then the balanced half-sample (BHS) method is applied to the groups. We show that the GBHS method leads to asymptotically incorrect inferences as the strata sample sizes n_h \\rightarrow \\infty with H fixed. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a repeatedly grouped balanced half-sample (RGBHS) method, which essentially involves independently repeating the grouping T times and then taking the average of the resulting T GBHS variance estimators. This method retains the simplicity of the GBHS method. We establish its asymptotic validity as \\min n_h \\rightarrow \\infty and T \\rightarrow \\infty. We also study an alternative method by forming substrata within each stratum, consisting of a pair of sampling units, and then applying the BHS method on the total set of substrata, treating them as strata. We establish its asymptotic validity as \\min n_h \\rightarrow \\infty. We provide simulation results on the finite-sample properties of the GBHS, RGBHS, the jackknife, and the alternative BHS method. Our results indicate that the proposed RGBHS method performs well for T as small as 15, thus providing flexibility in terms of the number of half-samples used. The alternative BHS method has also performed well in the simulation study.","PeriodicalId":49985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society","volume":"91 1","pages":"343-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476694","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Establishment surveys based on list frames often use stratified random sampling with a small number of strata, H, and relatively large sample sizes, n_h, within strata. For such surveys, a grouped balanced half-sample (GBHS) method is often used for variance estimation and for construction of confidence intervals on population parameters of interest. In this method the sample in each stratum is first randomly divided into two groups, and then the balanced half-sample (BHS) method is applied to the groups. We show that the GBHS method leads to asymptotically incorrect inferences as the strata sample sizes n_h \rightarrow \infty with H fixed. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a repeatedly grouped balanced half-sample (RGBHS) method, which essentially involves independently repeating the grouping T times and then taking the average of the resulting T GBHS variance estimators. This method retains the simplicity of the GBHS method. We establish its asymptotic validity as \min n_h \rightarrow \infty and T \rightarrow \infty. We also study an alternative method by forming substrata within each stratum, consisting of a pair of sampling units, and then applying the BHS method on the total set of substrata, treating them as strata. We establish its asymptotic validity as \min n_h \rightarrow \infty. We provide simulation results on the finite-sample properties of the GBHS, RGBHS, the jackknife, and the alternative BHS method. Our results indicate that the proposed RGBHS method performs well for T as small as 15, thus providing flexibility in terms of the number of half-samples used. The alternative BHS method has also performed well in the simulation study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层随机抽样中平衡半样本方差估计
基于列表框架的企业调查通常使用分层随机抽样,其中层数较少,H,而层内的样本量相对较大,n_h。对于此类调查,通常使用分组平衡半样本(GBHS)方法进行方差估计和对感兴趣的总体参数构建置信区间。该方法首先将每个地层的样本随机分成两组,然后采用平衡半样本(BHS)方法对每组样本进行分析。我们表明,当地层样本尺寸n_h \rightarrow\infty与H固定时,GBHS方法导致渐近不正确的推断。为了克服这一困难,我们提出了一种重复分组平衡半样本(RGBHS)方法,该方法本质上涉及独立重复分组T次,然后对结果T GBHS方差估计量取平均值。该方法保留了GBHS方法的简洁性。我们建立了其渐近有效性为\min n_h \rightarrow\infty和T \rightarrow\infty。我们还研究了一种替代方法,即在每个地层内形成由一对采样单元组成的基底,然后对整个基底集应用BHS方法,将其视为地层。我们建立了其渐近有效性为\min n_h \rightarrow\infty。我们提供了GBHS、RGBHS、刀切和备选BHS方法的有限样本特性的仿真结果。我们的结果表明,所提出的RGBHS方法在T小至15时表现良好,从而在使用的半样本数量方面提供了灵活性。替代BHS方法在仿真研究中也表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian approach to estimate annual bilateral migration flows for South America using census data Exploring Modeling with Data and Differential Equations Using R Calyampudi Radhakrishna (CR) Rao 1920–2023 Representative pure risk estimation by using data from epidemiologic studies, surveys, and registries: estimating risks for minority subgroups Where the bee sucks: a dynamic Bayesian network approach to decision support for pollinator abundance strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1