The household and the computer: a review

IF 1.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Historical Methods Pub Date : 1980-04-01 DOI:10.1080/01615440.1980.10594038
N. Fitch
{"title":"The household and the computer: a review","authors":"N. Fitch","doi":"10.1080/01615440.1980.10594038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author reviews the conclusions of Wachter Hammel and Laslett (see 45: Title 2614) regarding the social values associated with preindustrial household formation in England. She discusses the value of the approach taken by the authors and examines the appropriateness and accuracy of their methodology. Errors and limitations in the use of micro-simulation models are identified and various conceptual problems in the method used are discussed (ANNOTATION)","PeriodicalId":45535,"journal":{"name":"Historical Methods","volume":"48 1","pages":"127-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"1980-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01615440.1980.10594038","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1980.10594038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The author reviews the conclusions of Wachter Hammel and Laslett (see 45: Title 2614) regarding the social values associated with preindustrial household formation in England. She discusses the value of the approach taken by the authors and examines the appropriateness and accuracy of their methodology. Errors and limitations in the use of micro-simulation models are identified and various conceptual problems in the method used are discussed (ANNOTATION)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭与电脑:回顾
作者回顾了Wachter Hammel和Laslett(见45:Title 2614)关于与英国工业化前家庭形成相关的社会价值的结论。她讨论了作者所采取的方法的价值,并检查了他们的方法的适当性和准确性。指出了使用微观模拟模型的错误和局限性,并讨论了所使用方法中的各种概念性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historical Methods
Historical Methods Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Historical Methodsreaches an international audience of social scientists concerned with historical problems. It explores interdisciplinary approaches to new data sources, new approaches to older questions and material, and practical discussions of computer and statistical methodology, data collection, and sampling procedures. The journal includes the following features: “Evidence Matters” emphasizes how to find, decipher, and analyze evidence whether or not that evidence is meant to be quantified. “Database Developments” announces major new public databases or large alterations in older ones, discusses innovative ways to organize them, and explains new ways of categorizing information.
期刊最新文献
A New Strategy for Linking U.S. Historical Censuses: A Case Study for the IPUMS Multigenerational Longitudinal Panel. Simple Strategies for Improving Inference with Linked Data: A Case Study of the 1850-1930 IPUMS Linked Representative Historical Samples. Reconstruction of Birth Histories for the Study of Fertility in the United States, 1830-1910. Linking the 1940 U.S. Census with Modern Data. Union Army Veterans, All Grown Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1