Method and confusion in the study of the household: a review.

IF 1.6 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY Historical Methods Pub Date : 1989-04-01 DOI:10.1080/01615440.1989.10594179

James E. Smith

引用次数: 3

Abstract

A critical review is presented of the study by Steven Ruggles entitled Prolonged Connections: the Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth-Century England and America. The debate concerns the evidence for the prevalence of the nuclear family in the past. (ANNOTATION)

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

家庭研究中的方法与困惑:综述。

史蒂芬·拉格斯对这项研究发表了一篇批判性的评论，题为《长期联系:19世纪英美大家庭的兴起》。辩论涉及过去核心家庭普遍存在的证据。(注释)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Historical Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historical Methodsreaches an international audience of social scientists concerned with historical problems. It explores interdisciplinary approaches to new data sources, new approaches to older questions and material, and practical discussions of computer and statistical methodology, data collection, and sampling procedures. The journal includes the following features: “Evidence Matters” emphasizes how to find, decipher, and analyze evidence whether or not that evidence is meant to be quantified. “Database Developments” announces major new public databases or large alterations in older ones, discusses innovative ways to organize them, and explains new ways of categorizing information.