ATP bioluminescence to validate the decontamination process of gastrointestinal endoscopes

Geethanie Fernando MBBS, MD, FRCPA , Peter Collignon FRACP, FRCPA, FASM , Wendy Beckingham BHSc (nursing), Grad Cert (Infection Control), MClinical Nurs CICP
{"title":"ATP bioluminescence to validate the decontamination process of gastrointestinal endoscopes","authors":"Geethanie Fernando MBBS, MD, FRCPA ,&nbsp;Peter Collignon FRACP, FRCPA, FASM ,&nbsp;Wendy Beckingham BHSc (nursing), Grad Cert (Infection Control), MClinical Nurs CICP","doi":"10.1071/HI13034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Gastrointestinal endoscopes play an effective diagnostic role in modern medicine. The endoscopes become heavily contaminated with microorganisms during procedures and need careful reprocessing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was carried out at a gastroenterology hepatology unit to evaluate ATP bioluminescence, measured as relative light units (RLUs), to validate the decontamination processing of endoscopes. Flushes from endoscopes involved in 120 endoscopic procedures at four different stages: pre-patient (before the procedure), post-patient (after the procedure), post-cleaning (after manual cleaning) and post-disinfection were examined by ATP testing and microbiological culture. The hypothetical pass or fail limit of 100 RLUs was set according to previous studies in the literature. When the disinfection process failed, the above process was repeated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Average RLU readings were: pre-patient: 48; post-patient: 124 052; post-cleaning: 1423; and postdisinfection: 144. The corresponding culture results were: pre-patient: all negative; post-patient: all positive except for four; post-cleaning: positive except for 26; and post-disinfection: all negative. Although 21 (17%) of post-disinfection specimens showed failed ATPlevels of more than 100 RLUs, when the cleaning and disinfection process was repeated before they were used, all scopes then showed a pass level of less than 100 RLUs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ATP bioluminescence has the potential to play an important role in the validation process. This process would allow a quick turnaround time following a simple check procedure to be classified as safe in a busy endoscopic unit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13034","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Introduction

Gastrointestinal endoscopes play an effective diagnostic role in modern medicine. The endoscopes become heavily contaminated with microorganisms during procedures and need careful reprocessing.

Methods

A prospective study was carried out at a gastroenterology hepatology unit to evaluate ATP bioluminescence, measured as relative light units (RLUs), to validate the decontamination processing of endoscopes. Flushes from endoscopes involved in 120 endoscopic procedures at four different stages: pre-patient (before the procedure), post-patient (after the procedure), post-cleaning (after manual cleaning) and post-disinfection were examined by ATP testing and microbiological culture. The hypothetical pass or fail limit of 100 RLUs was set according to previous studies in the literature. When the disinfection process failed, the above process was repeated.

Results

Average RLU readings were: pre-patient: 48; post-patient: 124 052; post-cleaning: 1423; and postdisinfection: 144. The corresponding culture results were: pre-patient: all negative; post-patient: all positive except for four; post-cleaning: positive except for 26; and post-disinfection: all negative. Although 21 (17%) of post-disinfection specimens showed failed ATPlevels of more than 100 RLUs, when the cleaning and disinfection process was repeated before they were used, all scopes then showed a pass level of less than 100 RLUs.

Conclusions

ATP bioluminescence has the potential to play an important role in the validation process. This process would allow a quick turnaround time following a simple check procedure to be classified as safe in a busy endoscopic unit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ATP生物发光验证胃肠道内窥镜去污过程
胃肠内窥镜在现代医学中具有重要的诊断作用。内窥镜在操作过程中会被微生物严重污染,需要仔细的再处理。方法在胃肠病学肝病科进行了一项前瞻性研究,评估ATP生物发光,以相对光单位(RLUs)测量,以验证内窥镜的去污处理。通过ATP检测和微生物培养,研究了120个内窥镜手术在四个不同阶段的冲洗情况:患者前(手术前)、患者后(手术后)、清洁后(人工清洁后)和消毒后。假设100个rlu的合格或不合格限制是根据以往文献的研究设定的。当消毒过程失败时,重复上述过程。结果RLU平均读数为:术前48;术后:124 052;post-cleaning: 1423;消毒后:144。相应的培养结果为:术前:均为阴性;术后:除4例外均为阳性;后清洗:阳性26例除外;消毒后:都是阴性。虽然21个(17%)消毒后样品的atlevel超过100 rlu,但在使用前重复清洗和消毒过程时,所有样品的atlevel均低于100 rlu。结论satp生物发光技术有可能在验证过程中发挥重要作用。这一过程将允许在一个简单的检查程序之后快速周转时间,在繁忙的内窥镜单元中被归类为安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1