Nurses’ sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia

Maya Guest BOHS, BMedSc(Hon), PhD , Ashley K. Kable Dip Teach Nurs Ed, Grad Dip Health Serv Mgmt, PhD , May M. Boggess BMath(Hons), MSc(Stats), PhD , Mark Friedewald RN, CM, BHSc(Nursing)
{"title":"Nurses’ sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Maya Guest BOHS, BMedSc(Hon), PhD ,&nbsp;Ashley K. Kable Dip Teach Nurs Ed, Grad Dip Health Serv Mgmt, PhD ,&nbsp;May M. Boggess BMath(Hons), MSc(Stats), PhD ,&nbsp;Mark Friedewald RN, CM, BHSc(Nursing)","doi":"10.1071/HI13044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses’ Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 65-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13044","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S183556171630045X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW.

Methods

The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses’ Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis.

Results

The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs).

Conclusions

There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的公共和私人医疗机构中,护士的利器,包括针头,伤害
本文的目的是通过分析两个全州范围的护士横断面研究的合并数据,并比较新南威尔士州公共和私营部门以及不同护士实践领域之间的比率,来确定与护士锐器相关伤害率相关的因素。方法将2006年和2007年进行的两项研究的44项相似数据和相似的护士参与者(注册护士、注册助产士和登记护士)的数据进行合并。两项研究都从新南威尔士州护士协会的会员中招募了护士。分别将256名和1100名参与者的数据结合起来进行比较分析。结果锐器相关损伤年发生率为7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7)。私立医院的手术室、肾脏、精神健康和儿科执业领域的死亡率明显高于公立医院(17.9%对5.2%)。锐器安全实践的积极方面包括:90%的护士报告了他们的伤害,了解处理锐器伤害所需的流程,并发现他们的管理人员是可接近的。需要改进的领域包括提供有关负责随访的人员的信息(21%不确定),增加安全工程医疗器械(semd)的提供(50%无法获得),减少非semd的提供(75%可用),以及关注高度耐药的针头重新包装做法(35%报告重新包装非semd)。结论公立和私立医疗机构的锐器伤发生率存在显著差异。在各种护理实践环境中,存在着改进安全实践的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1