Attitudes towards antimicrobial stewardship: results from a large private hospital in Australia

Menino O. Cotta BPharm (Hons) , Megan S. Robertson MBBS , Mark Tacey BSc , Caroline Marshall MBBS, PhD , Karin A. Thursky MBBS, MD , Danny Liew MBBS, PhD , Kirsty L. Buising MBBS, MD
{"title":"Attitudes towards antimicrobial stewardship: results from a large private hospital in Australia","authors":"Menino O. Cotta BPharm (Hons) ,&nbsp;Megan S. Robertson MBBS ,&nbsp;Mark Tacey BSc ,&nbsp;Caroline Marshall MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Karin A. Thursky MBBS, MD ,&nbsp;Danny Liew MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Kirsty L. Buising MBBS, MD","doi":"10.1071/HI14008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>An effective hospital-wide antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program requires engagement with all healthcare professionals involved in antimicrobial use. It is therefore useful to consider attitudes and perceptions among clinical stakeholders in Australian private hospitals before introducingAMS in these facilities. The aim of this study was to describe perceptions and attitudes towards antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial use, AMS interventions, and willingness to participate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 26-item attitudinal survey was distributed to visiting specialists, nurses and pharmacists at a large (500 bed) private hospital in Australia. Survey questions utilised ‘Yes/No’ responses and a 7-point Likert scale ranging from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. Descriptive analyses were performed and Chi-squared tests conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were a total of 331 respondents (80 physicians, 58 surgeons, 78 anaesthetists, 105 nurses and 10 pharmacists). The response rate was 42% among clinicians, 100% among pharmacists and 13% among nurses. Only half of the respondents were willing to participate in proposed AMS interventions. A larger proportion of respondents believed that antimicrobial resistance was more of a serious problem in other Australian hospitals compared with the surveyed hospital (62% <em>v.</em> 45%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Fifty-eight percent agreed that improving prescribing at the hospital would reduce antimicrobial resistance. Twenty-nine percent of respondents had previous exposure to AMS, with pharmacists and physicians more likely to have heard of AMS compared with surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses (<em>P</em> = 0.016 and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the challenge of making antimicrobial resistance a relevant local issue in private hospitals and engaging key health professionals before implementing change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages 89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI14008","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Introduction

An effective hospital-wide antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program requires engagement with all healthcare professionals involved in antimicrobial use. It is therefore useful to consider attitudes and perceptions among clinical stakeholders in Australian private hospitals before introducingAMS in these facilities. The aim of this study was to describe perceptions and attitudes towards antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial use, AMS interventions, and willingness to participate.

Methods

A 26-item attitudinal survey was distributed to visiting specialists, nurses and pharmacists at a large (500 bed) private hospital in Australia. Survey questions utilised ‘Yes/No’ responses and a 7-point Likert scale ranging from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. Descriptive analyses were performed and Chi-squared tests conducted.

Results

There were a total of 331 respondents (80 physicians, 58 surgeons, 78 anaesthetists, 105 nurses and 10 pharmacists). The response rate was 42% among clinicians, 100% among pharmacists and 13% among nurses. Only half of the respondents were willing to participate in proposed AMS interventions. A larger proportion of respondents believed that antimicrobial resistance was more of a serious problem in other Australian hospitals compared with the surveyed hospital (62% v. 45%, P < 0.001). Fifty-eight percent agreed that improving prescribing at the hospital would reduce antimicrobial resistance. Twenty-nine percent of respondents had previous exposure to AMS, with pharmacists and physicians more likely to have heard of AMS compared with surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusions

This study highlights the challenge of making antimicrobial resistance a relevant local issue in private hospitals and engaging key health professionals before implementing change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗菌药物管理的态度:来自澳大利亚一家大型私立医院的结果
一个有效的全院抗菌素管理(AMS)计划需要所有参与抗菌素使用的医疗保健专业人员的参与。因此,在澳大利亚私立医院引入ams之前,考虑临床利益相关者的态度和看法是有用的。本研究的目的是描述对抗菌素耐药性、抗菌素使用、AMS干预措施和参与意愿的看法和态度。方法对澳大利亚某大型私立医院(500张床位)门诊专家、护士和药师进行26项态度调查。调查问题采用“是/否”回答和7分李克特量表,范围从“非常同意”到“非常不同意”。进行描述性分析和卡方检验。结果共调查331人,其中内科医生80人,外科医生58人,麻醉师78人,护士105人,药师10人。临床医生应答率为42%,药剂师应答率为100%,护士应答率为13%。只有一半的受访者愿意参与医疗辅助队提出的干预措施。更大比例的受访者认为,与接受调查的医院相比,抗菌素耐药性在其他澳大利亚医院更为严重(62%对45%,P <0.001)。58%的人同意改善医院的处方可以减少抗菌素耐药性。29%的受访者曾接触过AMS,与外科医生、麻醉师和护士相比,药剂师和医生更有可能听说过AMS (P = 0.016和P <0.001分别)。结论本研究强调了在私立医院将抗菌素耐药性作为一个相关的地方问题并在实施变革之前让关键卫生专业人员参与的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1