Clostridium difficile-associated disease: how much do we really know? A single institution study

Hedley S. Roth MBBS, MPH , Christopher T. Parker MBBS, BMSci , Roger J. Wale MBBS, FRACS , Satish K. Warrier MBBS, MS, FRACS
{"title":"Clostridium difficile-associated disease: how much do we really know? A single institution study","authors":"Hedley S. Roth MBBS, MPH ,&nbsp;Christopher T. Parker MBBS, BMSci ,&nbsp;Roger J. Wale MBBS, FRACS ,&nbsp;Satish K. Warrier MBBS, MS, FRACS","doi":"10.1071/HI14031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><em>Clostridium difficile</em> (<em>C. difficile</em>) is the most common cause of antibiotic-related diarrhoea. In the immunocompromised host it is a source of considerable morbidity. Transmission between patients is preventable. The aim of this study was to survey healthcare professionals’ knowledge of <em>Clostridium difficile</em> infection (CDI) at our institution.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A written survey was distributed to doctors and nurses of a major tertiary institution. The survey polled knowledge and management decisions regarding clinical scenarios relating to <em>C. Difficile</em>-associated disease and transmission. Survey responses were collated and analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and forty-six healthcare professionals (91.3%) completed the survey (81 nurses, 65 doctors). Thirty-two (21.9%) had attended an educational seminar on <em>C. difficile</em>. No healthcare worker was able to correctly answer all survey questions. Only four (2.7%) respondents correctly identified all major risk factors for CDI. Respondents who had previously attended a CDI information session were more likely to identify broad-spectrum antibiotic use as a risk factor (97% <em>v.</em> 82%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.046), and more likely to be aware of the existence of CDI in the community setting (97% <em>v.</em> 78%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). Thirty-four (23.3%) respondents identified the most important management aspects in non-severe CDI, while 85 (58.2%) identified the best method to remove <em>C. difficile</em> spores. Doctors were less likely to identify the correct method of preventing the transmission of the spore-form of <em>C. difficile</em> than nurses (49% <em>v.</em> 69%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Overall survey performance was better among employees who had attended an information session regarding CDI, (63.1% <em>v.</em> 56.7%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Knowledge of CDI is poor among healthcare professionals. A potential for further education exists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 122-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI14031","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the most common cause of antibiotic-related diarrhoea. In the immunocompromised host it is a source of considerable morbidity. Transmission between patients is preventable. The aim of this study was to survey healthcare professionals’ knowledge of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) at our institution.

Methods

A written survey was distributed to doctors and nurses of a major tertiary institution. The survey polled knowledge and management decisions regarding clinical scenarios relating to C. Difficile-associated disease and transmission. Survey responses were collated and analysed.

Results

One hundred and forty-six healthcare professionals (91.3%) completed the survey (81 nurses, 65 doctors). Thirty-two (21.9%) had attended an educational seminar on C. difficile. No healthcare worker was able to correctly answer all survey questions. Only four (2.7%) respondents correctly identified all major risk factors for CDI. Respondents who had previously attended a CDI information session were more likely to identify broad-spectrum antibiotic use as a risk factor (97% v. 82%, P = 0.046), and more likely to be aware of the existence of CDI in the community setting (97% v. 78%, P = 0.02). Thirty-four (23.3%) respondents identified the most important management aspects in non-severe CDI, while 85 (58.2%) identified the best method to remove C. difficile spores. Doctors were less likely to identify the correct method of preventing the transmission of the spore-form of C. difficile than nurses (49% v. 69%, P = 0.04). Overall survey performance was better among employees who had attended an information session regarding CDI, (63.1% v. 56.7%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Knowledge of CDI is poor among healthcare professionals. A potential for further education exists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艰难梭菌相关疾病:我们到底了解多少?单机构研究
艰难梭菌(C. difficile)是抗生素相关性腹泻的最常见原因。在免疫功能低下的宿主中,它是一个相当高发病率的来源。患者之间的传播是可以预防的。本研究旨在调查我院医护人员对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的了解情况。方法对某主要大专院校的医生和护士进行问卷调查。该调查调查了有关艰难梭菌相关疾病和传播的临床情况的知识和管理决策。对调查结果进行整理和分析。结果共有146名医护人员(护士81名,医生65名)完成调查,占91.3%。32人(21.9%)参加过艰难梭菌教育研讨会。没有医护人员能够正确回答所有调查问题。只有4名(2.7%)受访者正确识别了CDI的所有主要危险因素。以前参加过CDI信息会议的受访者更有可能将广谱抗生素使用确定为风险因素(97%对82%,P = 0.046),并且更有可能意识到社区环境中CDI的存在(97%对78%,P = 0.02)。34名(23.3%)受访者认为非严重CDI最重要的管理方面,85名(58.2%)受访者认为去除艰难梭菌孢子的最佳方法。医生识别正确预防艰难梭菌孢子型传播方法的可能性低于护士(49%对69%,P = 0.04)。在参加了CDI信息会议的员工中,总体调查表现更好(63.1% vs . 56.7%, P <0.01)。结论卫生专业人员对CDI的认识较差。存在进一步教育的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in publication scholarship in Healthcare Infection: a 12-year analysis Cross-sectional screening of healthcare workers at a regional chest clinic with an interferon gamma release assay: first report from Sri Lanka Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study Cultural dimensions relevant to antimicrobial stewardship: the contribution of individualism and power distance to perioperative prescribing practices in European hospitals Time series evaluation of the 3M™ Clean-Trace™ ATP detection device to confirm swab effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1