Theory of mind failure and emotion dysregulation as contributors to peer bullying among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Childrens Health Care Pub Date : 2021-06-08 DOI:10.1080/02739615.2021.1926250
H. Yilmaz Kafali, Binay Kayan Ocakoğlu, Adem Işık, Ümran Gül Ayvalık Baydur, Gizem Müjdecioğlu Demir, Müge Şahin Erener, Ö. Üneri
{"title":"Theory of mind failure and emotion dysregulation as contributors to peer bullying among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder","authors":"H. Yilmaz Kafali, Binay Kayan Ocakoğlu, Adem Işık, Ümran Gül Ayvalık Baydur, Gizem Müjdecioğlu Demir, Müge Şahin Erener, Ö. Üneri","doi":"10.1080/02739615.2021.1926250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated whether poor performance in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and emotion dysregulation (ED) contributes to involvement in bullying among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Altogether, 105 adolescents with ADHD aged 10–18 years (mean: 13.9±1.8 years, 77% boys) were recruited. RMET was applied to evaluate the ToM abilities. Participants completed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire to measure ED and evaluate involvement in bullying, respectively. Among the subjects, 24.8% were victims, 23.8% were perpetrators. The perpetrators and victims exhibited significantly lower RMET scores and higher DERS awareness scores than non-victims/non-perpetrators. The perpetrators also exhibited significantly higher DERS impulse scores and DERS total scores than non-victims/non-perpetrators. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that a 1-point decrease in the RMET score increased the odds of bullying victimization by 53% and bullying perpetration by 21.6%, while a 1-point increase in DERS impulse scores increased the risk of bullying perpetration by 14.9%. This study is the first to show an association between poor ToM ability and involvement in bullying as victims/perpetrators among children with ADHD. Both victims and perpetrators had problems with emotional awareness, while only perpetrators had difficulties controlling their impulses.","PeriodicalId":46607,"journal":{"name":"Childrens Health Care","volume":"50 1","pages":"413 - 431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02739615.2021.1926250","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childrens Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2021.1926250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated whether poor performance in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and emotion dysregulation (ED) contributes to involvement in bullying among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Altogether, 105 adolescents with ADHD aged 10–18 years (mean: 13.9±1.8 years, 77% boys) were recruited. RMET was applied to evaluate the ToM abilities. Participants completed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire to measure ED and evaluate involvement in bullying, respectively. Among the subjects, 24.8% were victims, 23.8% were perpetrators. The perpetrators and victims exhibited significantly lower RMET scores and higher DERS awareness scores than non-victims/non-perpetrators. The perpetrators also exhibited significantly higher DERS impulse scores and DERS total scores than non-victims/non-perpetrators. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that a 1-point decrease in the RMET score increased the odds of bullying victimization by 53% and bullying perpetration by 21.6%, while a 1-point increase in DERS impulse scores increased the risk of bullying perpetration by 14.9%. This study is the first to show an association between poor ToM ability and involvement in bullying as victims/perpetrators among children with ADHD. Both victims and perpetrators had problems with emotional awareness, while only perpetrators had difficulties controlling their impulses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意缺陷/多动障碍青少年同伴欺凌的心理失败和情绪失调理论
摘要:本研究旨在探讨注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)青少年在眼读心术测试(RMET)和情绪调节障碍(ED)中的不良表现是否会导致欺凌行为。共纳入105名10-18岁ADHD青少年(平均:13.9±1.8岁,77%为男孩)。采用RMET法评价学生的ToM能力。被试分别填写了情绪调节困难量表(DERS)和Olweus欺凌/受害者问卷来测量ED和评估欺凌参与。被害者占24.8%,加害者占23.8%。加害者和受害者的RMET得分显著低于非受害者/非加害者,而DERS意识得分显著高于非受害者/非加害者。加害者也表现出显著高于非受害者/非加害者的DERS冲动得分和DERS总分。二元logistic回归分析显示,RMET得分每降低1分,霸凌受害的几率增加53%,霸凌实施的几率增加21.6%,而DERS冲动得分每增加1分,霸凌实施的风险增加14.9%。这项研究首次表明,在患有多动症的儿童中,较差的ToM能力与作为受害者/施暴者参与欺凌之间存在关联。受害者和加害者都有情感意识方面的问题,而只有加害者难以控制自己的冲动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Childrens Health Care
Childrens Health Care PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Delay discounting and symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescents experiencing challenges with managing type 1 diabetes. Limitations and recommendations for use of secondary data analysis in pediatric research Linguistic predictors of the mentor-mentee relationship in a peer support program for adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease A scoping review and narrative synthesis on the relationship between anxiety and physical activity in children and adolescents with disabilities Family and child responses to asthma symptoms and associations with sleep in urban children with asthma: Does child weight matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1