Two Nations or Four Regions? A Test of Alternative Explanations of Value Differences Between Canada and the United States

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES American Review of Canadian Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02722011.2023.2212236
Nick Baxter-Moore, Munroe Eagles, Dylan S. McLean, Katryne Villeneuve-Siconnelly
{"title":"Two Nations or Four Regions? A Test of Alternative Explanations of Value Differences Between Canada and the United States","authors":"Nick Baxter-Moore, Munroe Eagles, Dylan S. McLean, Katryne Villeneuve-Siconnelly","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2212236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although Canada and the United States are among the most similar countries in the world, some scholars contend there are deep, enduring value differences separating Canadians from Americans. Lipset, for example, attributes this cultural “continental divide” principally to the origins of the two societies—respectively, the revolution in the United States and the resulting counter-revolution in the colonies to the north—and argues that value differences between Canadians and Americans have endured. Other scholars contend that Lipset’s focus on cross-national differences neglects important within-nation variation. Grabb and Curtis, for example, argue that cross-national differences are largely the product of wide divergence in the values of Francophone Québec and the American South, while English Canada and the northern United States display strong similarities. Using survey data drawn from university students in Grabb and Curtis’s four regions, our analysis tests these competing arguments.","PeriodicalId":43336,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Canadian Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"239 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2023.2212236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although Canada and the United States are among the most similar countries in the world, some scholars contend there are deep, enduring value differences separating Canadians from Americans. Lipset, for example, attributes this cultural “continental divide” principally to the origins of the two societies—respectively, the revolution in the United States and the resulting counter-revolution in the colonies to the north—and argues that value differences between Canadians and Americans have endured. Other scholars contend that Lipset’s focus on cross-national differences neglects important within-nation variation. Grabb and Curtis, for example, argue that cross-national differences are largely the product of wide divergence in the values of Francophone Québec and the American South, while English Canada and the northern United States display strong similarities. Using survey data drawn from university students in Grabb and Curtis’s four regions, our analysis tests these competing arguments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个国家还是四个地区?加拿大和美国价值差异的不同解释的检验
虽然加拿大和美国是世界上最相似的国家之一,但一些学者认为,加拿大人和美国人之间存在着深刻而持久的价值观差异。例如,利普塞特将这种文化上的“大陆分裂”主要归因于两个社会的起源——分别是美国的革命和由此导致的北方殖民地的反革命——并认为加拿大人和美国人之间的价值观差异一直存在。其他学者认为,利普塞特对跨国差异的关注忽视了重要的国内差异。例如,格拉布和柯蒂斯认为,跨国差异在很大程度上是讲法语的加拿大和美国南部价值观的巨大差异的产物,而讲英语的加拿大和美国北部则表现出强烈的相似性。利用从Grabb和Curtis的四个地区的大学生中抽取的调查数据,我们的分析检验了这些相互矛盾的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: American Nineteenth Century History is a peer-reviewed, transatlantic journal devoted to the history of the United States during the long nineteenth century. It welcomes contributions on themes and topics relating to America in this period: slavery, race and ethnicity, the Civil War and Reconstruction, military history, American nationalism, urban history, immigration and ethnicity, western history, the history of women, gender studies, African Americans and Native Americans, cultural studies and comparative pieces. In addition to articles based on original research, historiographical pieces, reassessments of historical controversies, and reappraisals of prominent events or individuals are welcome. Special issues devoted to a particular theme or topic will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Gender Gap and Academic Publishing in Political Science: Evidence from Canada Debating the Voting Age: How Canadian Legislators Grapple with the Federal Voting Age NORAD: In Perpetuity and Beyond Managing Federalism Through Pandemic The Right to Be Rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1