Effect of amniotic membrane and platelet-rich fibrin membrane on bone healing post endodontic surgery: An ultrasonographic, randomized controlled study

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-19 DOI:10.1002/term.3362
Saumya Johri, Promila Verma, Aseem Prakash Tikku, Rhythm Bains, Neera Kohli
{"title":"Effect of amniotic membrane and platelet-rich fibrin membrane on bone healing post endodontic surgery: An ultrasonographic, randomized controlled study","authors":"Saumya Johri,&nbsp;Promila Verma,&nbsp;Aseem Prakash Tikku,&nbsp;Rhythm Bains,&nbsp;Neera Kohli","doi":"10.1002/term.3362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of membrane barriers and bone grafting materials in endodontic surgery promotes healing by regeneration rather than repair by scar tissue. Due to its valuable regenerative and therapeutic properties, the human amniotic membrane can support ideal periapical rehabilitation and promote better healing after surgery. The current trial aimed to evaluate the amniotic membrane's healing potential and compare it with platelet-rich fibrin using color doppler sonography. The current study is a randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, single-center study. Thirty-four systematically healthy individuals requiring endodontic surgery who fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected and randomly placed in two groups. Surgical curettage of the bony lesion was performed and filled with hydroxyapatite graft. Amniotic membrane (Group 1) and platelet-rich fibrin (Group 2) were placed over the bony crypt, and the flap was sutured back. The lesion's surface area and vascularity were the parameters assessed with ultrasound and color doppler. and observations: The groups found a significant difference in mean vascularity at 1 month and mean vascularity change from baseline to 1 month (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Mean surface area had no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, in terms of the percentage change in surface area, a significant difference was found from baseline to 6 months (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Amniotic membrane was a significantly better promoter of angiogenesis than platelet-rich fibrin in the current trial. The osteogenic potential of both materials was similar. However, the clinical application, availability, and cost-effectiveness of amniotic membrane support it as a promising therapeutic alternative in clinical translation. Further large-scale trials and histologic studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/term.3362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of membrane barriers and bone grafting materials in endodontic surgery promotes healing by regeneration rather than repair by scar tissue. Due to its valuable regenerative and therapeutic properties, the human amniotic membrane can support ideal periapical rehabilitation and promote better healing after surgery. The current trial aimed to evaluate the amniotic membrane's healing potential and compare it with platelet-rich fibrin using color doppler sonography. The current study is a randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, single-center study. Thirty-four systematically healthy individuals requiring endodontic surgery who fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected and randomly placed in two groups. Surgical curettage of the bony lesion was performed and filled with hydroxyapatite graft. Amniotic membrane (Group 1) and platelet-rich fibrin (Group 2) were placed over the bony crypt, and the flap was sutured back. The lesion's surface area and vascularity were the parameters assessed with ultrasound and color doppler. and observations: The groups found a significant difference in mean vascularity at 1 month and mean vascularity change from baseline to 1 month (p < 0.05). Mean surface area had no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, in terms of the percentage change in surface area, a significant difference was found from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05). Amniotic membrane was a significantly better promoter of angiogenesis than platelet-rich fibrin in the current trial. The osteogenic potential of both materials was similar. However, the clinical application, availability, and cost-effectiveness of amniotic membrane support it as a promising therapeutic alternative in clinical translation. Further large-scale trials and histologic studies are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羊膜和富血小板纤维蛋白膜对牙髓手术后骨愈合的影响:一项超声随机对照研究
使用膜屏障和植骨材料在根管手术促进愈合再生而不是修复疤痕组织。由于其宝贵的再生和治疗特性,人羊膜可以支持理想的根尖周康复,促进手术后更好的愈合。目前的试验旨在评估羊膜的愈合潜力,并使用彩色多普勒超声将其与富血小板纤维蛋白进行比较。目前的研究是一项随机、双盲、平行组、单中心研究。选择34名符合所有纳入和排除标准的需要进行根管手术的系统健康个体,随机分为两组。手术刮除骨病变并用羟基磷灰石移植物填充。将羊膜(1组)和富血小板纤维蛋白(2组)置于骨隐窝上,并将皮瓣缝合。超声和彩色多普勒评价病变的表面积和血管分布。观察结果:两组患者在1个月时的平均血管密度和从基线到1个月的平均血管密度变化有显著差异(p <0.05)。平均表面积组间差异无统计学意义。然而,就表面积的百分比变化而言,从基线到6个月有显著差异(p <0.05)。在目前的试验中,羊膜比富含血小板的纤维蛋白更能促进血管生成。两种材料的成骨潜能相似。然而,羊膜的临床应用,可用性和成本效益支持它作为一个有前途的治疗替代临床翻译。进一步的大规模试验和组织学研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.
期刊最新文献
Decellularisation and Characterisation of Porcine Pleura as Bioscaffolds in Tissue Engineering Harnessing the Regenerative Potential of Fetal Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells in the Biofabrication of Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts (TEVGs) Endothelial Cell-Derived Exosomes Inhibit Osteoblast Apoptosis and Steroid-Induced Necrosis of Femoral Head Progression by Activating the PI3K/Akt/Bcl-2 Pathway Chromatin Condensation Delays Senescence in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Safeguarding Nuclear Damages during In Vitro Expansion Targeting of C-ROS-1 Activity Using a Controlled Release Carrier to Treat Craniosynostosis in a Preclinical Model of Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1