Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS English Text Construction Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1075/ETC.10.2.03LAN
R. Langacker
{"title":"Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers","authors":"R. Langacker","doi":"10.1075/ETC.10.2.03LAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Absolute quantifiers (e.g. many, few, three) have adjectival uses, but when initial they function as grounding elements: like demonstratives, articles, and relative quantifiers (e.g. all, most, every), they indicate the epistemic status of the nominal referent. This ambivalence is due to their being intermediate, having semantic affinities with both categories but being marginal with respect to each. The dual role of absolute quantifiers is readily described in Cognitive Grammar, given its dynamic view of meaning as consisting in semantic functions (interactive tasks to be fulfilled). These functions belong to the symbolic assemblies constituting language structure; they are fundamental, the role of lexicon and grammar being to effect their implementation. More schematic functions –such as grounding –are independent of any particular implementation. In the absence of a dedicated grounding element, absolute quantifiers assume that function through a conventional pattern of implicit functional augmentation (a common type of construction).","PeriodicalId":42970,"journal":{"name":"English Text Construction","volume":"10 1","pages":"233-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/ETC.10.2.03LAN","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Text Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ETC.10.2.03LAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Absolute quantifiers (e.g. many, few, three) have adjectival uses, but when initial they function as grounding elements: like demonstratives, articles, and relative quantifiers (e.g. all, most, every), they indicate the epistemic status of the nominal referent. This ambivalence is due to their being intermediate, having semantic affinities with both categories but being marginal with respect to each. The dual role of absolute quantifiers is readily described in Cognitive Grammar, given its dynamic view of meaning as consisting in semantic functions (interactive tasks to be fulfilled). These functions belong to the symbolic assemblies constituting language structure; they are fundamental, the role of lexicon and grammar being to effect their implementation. More schematic functions –such as grounding –are independent of any particular implementation. In the absence of a dedicated grounding element, absolute quantifiers assume that function through a conventional pattern of implicit functional augmentation (a common type of construction).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础、语义功能和绝对量词
绝对量词(如many, few, three)有形容词的用途,但当它们作为基础元素出现时,就像指示词、冠词和关系量词(如all, most, every)一样,它们表明了名义指称物的认知状态。这种矛盾心理是由于它们是中间的,与两个类别都有语义亲和力,但相对于每个类别都是边缘的。绝对量词的双重作用在认知语法中很容易描述,因为它的动态观点认为意义由语义功能组成(要完成的交互任务)。这些功能属于构成语言结构的符号集合;它们是基本的,词汇和语法的作用是影响它们的实现。更多的原理图功能(如接地)独立于任何特定的实现。在没有专门的基础元素的情况下,绝对量词假设通过隐式功能增强的传统模式(一种常见的结构类型)发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
English Text Construction
English Text Construction LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Creating an information security policyin a bank “May the path never close” Dating “Sweet Desire” ‘Narrative structure’, ‘rhetorical structure’, ‘text structure’ A contrastive look at Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1