High-rise apartment quality evaluation and related demographic factors: lesson from RentSafeTO programme

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building Research and Information Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1080/09613218.2022.2162475
Zhishan Zhong, Z. Gou
{"title":"High-rise apartment quality evaluation and related demographic factors: lesson from RentSafeTO programme","authors":"Zhishan Zhong, Z. Gou","doi":"10.1080/09613218.2022.2162475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the rapid increase in urbanization and the number of residents living in high-rise apartment buildings, the quality of living environments in terms of the facility, safety and hygiene of high-rise housing has become an important topic. Although numerous studies have investigated occupant satisfaction through subjective assessment, only few studies have used objective assessment methods, such as expert evaluation, to elucidate the quality of high-rise apartments and the related occupancy factors. According to the dataset from Toronto's RentSafeTO programme, which provides the results for 9928 high-rise apartments evaluated using 20 quality indicators, this study conducted a factor analysis and identified two main factors for assessing high-rise housing: building structure and building facilities. Furthermore, this study used multiple regression models and census data to analyse the housing quality at the regional level. The results of social housing and private housing differed. Labour force attributes, education, immigration and ethnic origin significantly affected the quality of private housing. The results provide important directions for the post-occupancy evaluation of high-rise apartments. In addition, demographic factors significantly affected residential quality. This study provides a basis for the government to formulate equal and unbiased support for high-rise building maintenance and management.","PeriodicalId":55316,"journal":{"name":"Building Research and Information","volume":"51 1","pages":"430 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Research and Information","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2162475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the rapid increase in urbanization and the number of residents living in high-rise apartment buildings, the quality of living environments in terms of the facility, safety and hygiene of high-rise housing has become an important topic. Although numerous studies have investigated occupant satisfaction through subjective assessment, only few studies have used objective assessment methods, such as expert evaluation, to elucidate the quality of high-rise apartments and the related occupancy factors. According to the dataset from Toronto's RentSafeTO programme, which provides the results for 9928 high-rise apartments evaluated using 20 quality indicators, this study conducted a factor analysis and identified two main factors for assessing high-rise housing: building structure and building facilities. Furthermore, this study used multiple regression models and census data to analyse the housing quality at the regional level. The results of social housing and private housing differed. Labour force attributes, education, immigration and ethnic origin significantly affected the quality of private housing. The results provide important directions for the post-occupancy evaluation of high-rise apartments. In addition, demographic factors significantly affected residential quality. This study provides a basis for the government to formulate equal and unbiased support for high-rise building maintenance and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高层公寓质量评价及相关人口因素:来自RentSafeTO项目的经验
随着城市化的快速发展和高层住宅居民数量的增加,高层住宅的设施、安全、卫生等居住环境质量已成为一个重要的课题。虽然有很多研究通过主观评价来调查居住者的满意度,但很少有研究采用专家评价等客观评价方法来阐述高层公寓的质量和相关的居住者因素。根据多伦多RentSafeTO项目的数据集,该项目使用20个质量指标对9928套高层公寓进行了评估,该研究进行了因子分析,并确定了评估高层住宅的两个主要因素:建筑结构和建筑设施。在此基础上,本文运用多元回归模型和人口普查数据对区域住房质量进行了分析。社会住房和私人住房的结果不同。劳动力属性、教育、移民和种族血统显著影响私人住房的质量。研究结果为高层公寓的使用后评价提供了重要的指导。此外,人口因素对居住质量影响显著。本研究为政府制定平等、公正的高层建筑维修管理支持政策提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building Research and Information
Building Research and Information 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION (BRI) is a leading international refereed journal focussed on buildings and their supporting systems. Unique to BRI is a focus on a holistic, transdisciplinary approach to buildings and the complexity of issues involving the built environment with other systems over the course of their life: planning, briefing, design, construction, occupation and use, property exchange and evaluation, maintenance, alteration and end of life. Published articles provide conceptual and evidence-based approaches which reflect the complexity and linkages between cultural, environmental, economic, social, organisational, quality of life, health, well-being, design and engineering of the built environment.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the feasibility of mobile robots for post-occupancy evaluations Indoor environmental evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine clinic – taking the treatment space as an example Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems Perceptions of volume home builders and the transition to net zero emissions housing in Australia The impact of light adjustment versus tuneable white mode on ICU staff’s circadian rhythms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1