Reflections on a Quarter Century of JME Publication

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 COMMUNICATION JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2014-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08997764.2014.904592
R. Picard
{"title":"Reflections on a Quarter Century of JME Publication","authors":"R. Picard","doi":"10.1080/08997764.2014.904592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Journal of Media Economics was an impetuous and mad idea, born out of frustration and desires to promote more research on economic issues affecting media. The frustration part came naturally. Media and communication journals were only marginally interested in papers dealing with economics and existing media economic scholarship was too undeveloped to produce papers of interest to economic journals. The desire to promote and improve media economic research was prompted by the realization that many media issues and challenges could not be answered by the dominant social science research perspectives and would only be well understood by employing economic theory and methods. As we established the Journal a quarter of century ago, neither I nor its editorial board had an inkling that the field of study would grow so rapidly or that the Journal would play such a central role in its expansion. The field had been growing for a decade when the Journal was established in 1988. By today’s standards, the Journal was crudely designed and printed, but at the time it was on the leading edge of desktop publishing and on-demand printing. The biggest challenge was obtaining sufficient quality content, but it soon began attracting submissions from media, business, and economics scholars who created a body of knowledge that advanced the field rapidly. As editor I gained an advantage of seeing where the field was going long before its new directions made it to print. In its initial years the Journal focused on issues involving business and regulatory economics, primarily because those were the most developed areas of inquiry among scholars with an interest in media at that time. Structural studies using IO approaches, demand and consumption studies, resource allocation studies, financial performance studies, and market power studies became common, as were essays showing how to apply economic concepts to media analysis and media policy. Authors were particularly interested in the effects of new media and new entrants—at that time the spread of cable television and then telco entry into cable provision. The Journal matured as the field of media economics developed and interest in the issues involving media expanded to researchers in economic departments, as well as those in media and business schools. Although market issues remained a central theme, research about choice and behavior of consumers and companies flourished, incorporating concepts of risk, trust, and transaction costs. Research also began expanding from microto macroeconomic issues and economic modelling, which had been absent in earlier years of the Journal, began to appear and offer explanatory power. Articles began addressing issues of network economics, market","PeriodicalId":29945,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS","volume":"27 1","pages":"107 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08997764.2014.904592","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2014.904592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Journal of Media Economics was an impetuous and mad idea, born out of frustration and desires to promote more research on economic issues affecting media. The frustration part came naturally. Media and communication journals were only marginally interested in papers dealing with economics and existing media economic scholarship was too undeveloped to produce papers of interest to economic journals. The desire to promote and improve media economic research was prompted by the realization that many media issues and challenges could not be answered by the dominant social science research perspectives and would only be well understood by employing economic theory and methods. As we established the Journal a quarter of century ago, neither I nor its editorial board had an inkling that the field of study would grow so rapidly or that the Journal would play such a central role in its expansion. The field had been growing for a decade when the Journal was established in 1988. By today’s standards, the Journal was crudely designed and printed, but at the time it was on the leading edge of desktop publishing and on-demand printing. The biggest challenge was obtaining sufficient quality content, but it soon began attracting submissions from media, business, and economics scholars who created a body of knowledge that advanced the field rapidly. As editor I gained an advantage of seeing where the field was going long before its new directions made it to print. In its initial years the Journal focused on issues involving business and regulatory economics, primarily because those were the most developed areas of inquiry among scholars with an interest in media at that time. Structural studies using IO approaches, demand and consumption studies, resource allocation studies, financial performance studies, and market power studies became common, as were essays showing how to apply economic concepts to media analysis and media policy. Authors were particularly interested in the effects of new media and new entrants—at that time the spread of cable television and then telco entry into cable provision. The Journal matured as the field of media economics developed and interest in the issues involving media expanded to researchers in economic departments, as well as those in media and business schools. Although market issues remained a central theme, research about choice and behavior of consumers and companies flourished, incorporating concepts of risk, trust, and transaction costs. Research also began expanding from microto macroeconomic issues and economic modelling, which had been absent in earlier years of the Journal, began to appear and offer explanatory power. Articles began addressing issues of network economics, market
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《JME》出版四分之一世纪的反思
《媒体经济学杂志》是一个冲动而疯狂的想法,它诞生于挫败感和推动更多影响媒体的经济问题研究的愿望。挫折的部分是自然的。媒体和传播学期刊对涉及经济学的论文只感兴趣,现有的媒体经济学研究太不发达,无法产生经济学期刊感兴趣的论文。推动和改进媒体经济研究的愿望是由于人们认识到,许多媒体问题和挑战无法用主流的社会科学研究视角来回答,只有运用经济理论和方法才能很好地理解。当我们在25年前创立《华尔街日报》时,我和它的编辑委员会都没有想到这个研究领域会发展得如此之快,也没有想到《华尔街日报》会在它的扩张中发挥如此重要的作用。《华尔街日报》1988年创刊时,这一领域已经发展了10年。按照今天的标准,《华尔街日报》的设计和印刷都很粗糙,但在当时,它处于桌面出版和按需印刷的前沿。最大的挑战是获得足够的高质量内容,但它很快就开始吸引媒体、商业和经济学者的投稿,他们创造了一个知识体系,迅速推动了该领域的发展。作为编辑,我获得了一个优势,在它的新方向出版之前,我就看到了这个领域的发展方向。在创刊初期,《华尔街日报》主要关注商业和监管经济学问题,主要是因为这是当时对媒体感兴趣的学者研究最发达的领域。使用IO方法的结构研究、需求和消费研究、资源分配研究、财务绩效研究和市场力量研究变得普遍,展示如何将经济概念应用于媒体分析和媒体政策的论文也变得普遍。作者们对新媒体和新进入者的影响特别感兴趣——当时有线电视的普及和电信公司进入有线电视供应。随着媒体经济学领域的发展,以及对涉及媒体问题的兴趣扩展到经济部门以及媒体和商学院的研究人员,《华尔街日报》逐渐成熟。虽然市场问题仍然是一个中心主题,但关于消费者和公司的选择和行为的研究蓬勃发展,纳入了风险、信任和交易成本的概念。研究也开始从微观问题扩展到宏观经济问题,《华尔街日报》早期缺失的经济模型开始出现,并提供了解释力。文章开始讨论网络经济、市场等问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Media Economics publishes original research on the economics and policy of mediated communication, focusing on firms, markets, and institutions. Reflecting the increasing diversity of analytical approaches employed in economics and recognizing that policies promoting social and political objectives may have significant economic impacts on media, the Journal encourages submissions reflecting the insights of diverse disciplinary perspectives and research methodologies, both empirical and theoretical.
期刊最新文献
Newly subscribed! Effects of e-mail newsletters on news-reading habit and subscriber retention during onboarding: evidence from clickstream and subscription data The show must go on(line): the impact of content and system quality on the usage of television streaming content libraries Applying option thinking to value experiential marketing content Influencer transgressions: The impacts on endorser and brand Content-, system-, and hardware-related effects on the experience of flow in VR gaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1