Policy versus ground reality: secondary English language assessment system in Bangladesh

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Journal Pub Date : 2014-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09585176.2014.909323
Sharmistha Das, Robina Shaheen, Prithvi N. Shrestha, Arifa Rahman, Rubina Khan
{"title":"Policy versus ground reality: secondary English language assessment system in Bangladesh","authors":"Sharmistha Das, Robina Shaheen, Prithvi N. Shrestha, Arifa Rahman, Rubina Khan","doi":"10.1080/09585176.2014.909323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any policy reform in education is highly effective when it is planned and implemented ‘holistically’ and yet, it is the most challenging way forward. Many countries in Asia have reformed their English language policies and syllabi in the last two decades due to the increasing value of the language worldwide. Motivated by a ‘communicative approach’ to English language teaching, Bangladesh was one of the countries that launched such a reform in the 1990s. However, this reform has been criticised for imposing the changes on teachers without preparing them sufficiently. More importantly, there is limited evidence as to how much the secondary English language assessment system is aligned with the changes introduced in the curriculum. In order to explore this gap, a medium-scale study was conducted in 38 secondary schools in Bangladesh, following a mixed methods approach. The findings highlighted a ‘mismatch’ between the intended English language learning outcomes and current assessment practices, including the resulting challenges faced by the teachers. This paper argues that language education reform is likely to fail if the assessment system is not aligned with the curriculum.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2014.909323","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.909323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Any policy reform in education is highly effective when it is planned and implemented ‘holistically’ and yet, it is the most challenging way forward. Many countries in Asia have reformed their English language policies and syllabi in the last two decades due to the increasing value of the language worldwide. Motivated by a ‘communicative approach’ to English language teaching, Bangladesh was one of the countries that launched such a reform in the 1990s. However, this reform has been criticised for imposing the changes on teachers without preparing them sufficiently. More importantly, there is limited evidence as to how much the secondary English language assessment system is aligned with the changes introduced in the curriculum. In order to explore this gap, a medium-scale study was conducted in 38 secondary schools in Bangladesh, following a mixed methods approach. The findings highlighted a ‘mismatch’ between the intended English language learning outcomes and current assessment practices, including the resulting challenges faced by the teachers. This paper argues that language education reform is likely to fail if the assessment system is not aligned with the curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策与现实:孟加拉国的二级英语语言评估系统
任何教育方面的政策改革,在“整体”规划和实施时都是非常有效的,然而,这是最具挑战性的前进道路。在过去的二十年里,由于英语在世界范围内的价值不断增加,亚洲许多国家都改革了他们的英语政策和教学大纲。在“交际教学法”的推动下,孟加拉国是上世纪90年代发起这种改革的国家之一。然而,这项改革被批评为在没有充分准备的情况下将变化强加给教师。更重要的是,关于中学英语语言评估系统在多大程度上与课程中引入的变化保持一致的证据有限。为了探索这一差距,在孟加拉国的38所中学进行了一项中等规模的研究,采用混合方法。调查结果强调了预期的英语学习成果与当前评估实践之间的“不匹配”,包括教师面临的挑战。本文认为,如果评价体系与课程不一致,语言教育改革很可能会失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Curriculum making and knowledge conceptions in classrooms in the context of standards‐based curricula Review of: Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world: Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiryB.Green (Eds.) M.Brennan (Eds.) P.Roberts (Eds.) Palgrave MacMillan, 2021, XVII + 355 pp. ISBN 978‐3‐030‐61666‐3. 129,99 € (Hardcover). Teachers’ Perceptions of Physical literacy Curriculum in context Learners’ views of literature in EFL education from curricular and assessment perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1