Transforming professional learning and practice in assessment for learning

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Journal Pub Date : 2014-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09585176.2014.981557
Jenny Poskitt
{"title":"Transforming professional learning and practice in assessment for learning","authors":"Jenny Poskitt","doi":"10.1080/09585176.2014.981557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing student learning is a complex process requiring teachers to have deep knowledge of the curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy. Changing political climates mean that teachers are expected to respond to new approaches or systems and adjust their classroom practice accordingly. Teachers often engage in professional learning (PL) to assist their knowledge and classroom practice, but what impact does PL have on their assessment practice as well as student learning and achievement? This paper examines optimal PL principles, the New Zealand assessment policy context, and application of assessment for learning principles in a nation-wide PL programme. Empirical data presented in relation to the five levels of Guskey's (2002) model evaluating PL indicate successful outcomes at the classroom level. However, application of Carless’ (2005) theoretical framework on embedding PL changes in schools reveals an area of neglect: attending to system (macro) level needs. Collaborative partnerships between schools and the wider community are posited as essential determinants of assessment literacies and transformational PL in times of political change.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2014.981557","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.981557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Assessing student learning is a complex process requiring teachers to have deep knowledge of the curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy. Changing political climates mean that teachers are expected to respond to new approaches or systems and adjust their classroom practice accordingly. Teachers often engage in professional learning (PL) to assist their knowledge and classroom practice, but what impact does PL have on their assessment practice as well as student learning and achievement? This paper examines optimal PL principles, the New Zealand assessment policy context, and application of assessment for learning principles in a nation-wide PL programme. Empirical data presented in relation to the five levels of Guskey's (2002) model evaluating PL indicate successful outcomes at the classroom level. However, application of Carless’ (2005) theoretical framework on embedding PL changes in schools reveals an area of neglect: attending to system (macro) level needs. Collaborative partnerships between schools and the wider community are posited as essential determinants of assessment literacies and transformational PL in times of political change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变专业学习和学习评估实践
评估学生的学习是一个复杂的过程,要求教师对课程、评估和教学法有深入的了解。不断变化的政治气候意味着教师需要对新的方法或系统作出反应,并相应地调整他们的课堂实践。教师经常从事专业学习(PL)来辅助他们的知识和课堂实践,但PL对他们的评估实践以及学生的学习和成就有什么影响?本文考察了最佳PL原则,新西兰评估政策背景,以及在全国PL计划中评估学习原则的应用。与Guskey(2002)评估PL模型的五个层次相关的经验数据表明,在课堂层面上取得了成功的结果。然而,应用Carless(2005)关于在学校中嵌入PL变化的理论框架揭示了一个被忽视的领域:关注系统(宏观)层面的需求。学校和更广泛的社区之间的合作伙伴关系被认为是政治变革时期评估素养和转型PL的重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Curriculum making and knowledge conceptions in classrooms in the context of standards‐based curricula Review of: Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world: Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiryB.Green (Eds.) M.Brennan (Eds.) P.Roberts (Eds.) Palgrave MacMillan, 2021, XVII + 355 pp. ISBN 978‐3‐030‐61666‐3. 129,99 € (Hardcover). Teachers’ Perceptions of Physical literacy Curriculum in context Learners’ views of literature in EFL education from curricular and assessment perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1