Criticism of the paper titled ‘Solidification thermal parameters, microstructural evolution and dendritic growth in an AlCuNi alloy’ by Correa et al.

IF 1.2 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Philosophical Magazine Letters Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1080/09500839.2021.1994160
M. Tiryakioğlu, Güven Kurtuldu
{"title":"Criticism of the paper titled ‘Solidification thermal parameters, microstructural evolution and dendritic growth in an AlCuNi alloy’ by Correa et al.","authors":"M. Tiryakioğlu, Güven Kurtuldu","doi":"10.1080/09500839.2021.1994160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Correa et al. [1] conducted experiments on the relationship between solidification parameters, including solidification time ts and secondary dendrite arm spacing λ2, for an Al-3wt.%Cu-3wt.%Ni alloy. Their data for the ts λ2 relationship are presented in Figure 1. Note that there are two regions with very different slopes (i.e. the exponent of ts). The fit to the data by Correa et al. is presented in the figure. Note that the slope in the trend of the data, i.e. the exponent of solidification time, is 0.076 below ts = 70 s – a value significantly less than 1/3. At longer solidification times, the exponent of the solidification time is 0.251, a value approaching 1/3, which is consistent with coarsening. The reason for the existence of two distinct regions is unknown. Correa et al. applied the Rappaz-Boettinger [2] and Tiryakioğlu [3] models for the ts λ2 relationship to their dataset and reported that both models overestimated λ2 significantly. We note that Correa et al. used a surface tension value of 1.29 N/ m, rather than the solid–liquid interfacial energy, in their calculations. This is consistent with their previous studies [4]. We contend that the approach taken by Correa et al. is erroneous on account of the following reasons:","PeriodicalId":19860,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2021.1994160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, Correa et al. [1] conducted experiments on the relationship between solidification parameters, including solidification time ts and secondary dendrite arm spacing λ2, for an Al-3wt.%Cu-3wt.%Ni alloy. Their data for the ts λ2 relationship are presented in Figure 1. Note that there are two regions with very different slopes (i.e. the exponent of ts). The fit to the data by Correa et al. is presented in the figure. Note that the slope in the trend of the data, i.e. the exponent of solidification time, is 0.076 below ts = 70 s – a value significantly less than 1/3. At longer solidification times, the exponent of the solidification time is 0.251, a value approaching 1/3, which is consistent with coarsening. The reason for the existence of two distinct regions is unknown. Correa et al. applied the Rappaz-Boettinger [2] and Tiryakioğlu [3] models for the ts λ2 relationship to their dataset and reported that both models overestimated λ2 significantly. We note that Correa et al. used a surface tension value of 1.29 N/ m, rather than the solid–liquid interfacial energy, in their calculations. This is consistent with their previous studies [4]. We contend that the approach taken by Correa et al. is erroneous on account of the following reasons:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对Correa等人发表的题为“AlCuNi合金的凝固热参数、显微组织演变和枝晶生长”的论文的批评。
最近,Correa等人对al -3wt.%Cu-3wt进行了凝固参数(凝固时间ts与二次枝晶臂间距λ2)关系的实验。%镍合金。他们的ts λ2关系数据如图1所示。注意,有两个区域具有非常不同的斜率(即ts的指数)。Correa等人对数据的拟合结果如图所示。注意,数据趋势的斜率,即凝固时间指数,在ts = 70 s以下为0.076,这个值明显小于1/3。在较长凝固时间下,凝固时间的指数为0.251,接近1/3,与粗化一致。两个不同地区存在的原因尚不清楚。Correa等人将Rappaz-Boettinger[2]和Tiryakioğlu[3]模型用于其数据集的ts - λ2关系,并报道这两个模型都显著高估了λ2。我们注意到,Correa等人在计算中使用了1.29 N/ m的表面张力值,而不是固液界面能。这与他们之前的研究结果一致。我们认为Correa等人采用的方法是错误的,原因如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophical Magazine Letters
Philosophical Magazine Letters 物理-物理:凝聚态物理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Philosophical Magazine Letters is the rapid communications part of the highly respected Philosophical Magazine, which was first published in 1798. Its Editors consider for publication short and timely contributions in the field of condensed matter describing original results, theories and concepts relating to the structure and properties of crystalline materials, ceramics, polymers, glasses, amorphous films, composites and soft matter. Articles emphasizing experimental, theoretical and modelling studies on solids, especially those that interpret behaviour on a microscopic, atomic or electronic scale, are particularly appropriate. Manuscripts are considered on the strict condition that they have been submitted only to Philosophical Magazine Letters , that they have not been published already, and that they are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Martensitic transformation of reversed austenite in a low-carbon 7Ni steel Machine-learning-assisted analysis of highly transient X-ray imaging sequences of weld pools Prediction of material toughness using ensemble learning and data augmentation Sulphuric precipitates in novel titanium-based, sulphur-bearing bulk metallic glass – a BMG composite? Assessment of Bayesian guidance strategy to develop bake-hardening ferritic steel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1