Hayek and the General Theory *

IF 0.6 3区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 2006-06-01 DOI:10.1080/09672560600708284
Nicolò De vecchi
{"title":"Hayek and the General Theory *","authors":"Nicolò De vecchi","doi":"10.1080/09672560600708284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hayek did not review the General Theory, but he criticized it in Profits, Interest and Investment (1939) and in part IV of The Pure Theory of Capital (1941). First, he showed that only exceptionally does greater consumption favour investment and employment. Second, he rejected Keynes's liquidity preference and maintained that only in an ‘extreme case’ might it be said that Keynes's theory of the rate of interest is valid. Although he correctly identified the gist of Keynes's theoretical innovation, his criticisms were already implicitly answered in the General Theory.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"13 1","pages":"233 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09672560600708284","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560600708284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Hayek did not review the General Theory, but he criticized it in Profits, Interest and Investment (1939) and in part IV of The Pure Theory of Capital (1941). First, he showed that only exceptionally does greater consumption favour investment and employment. Second, he rejected Keynes's liquidity preference and maintained that only in an ‘extreme case’ might it be said that Keynes's theory of the rate of interest is valid. Although he correctly identified the gist of Keynes's theoretical innovation, his criticisms were already implicitly answered in the General Theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈耶克与通论*
哈耶克没有回顾《通论》,但他在《利润、利息与投资》(1939)和《纯粹资本论》第四部分(1941)中对《通论》进行了批判。首先,他指出,只有在特殊情况下,更大的消费才有利于投资和就业。其次,他反对凯恩斯的流动性偏好,并坚持认为,只有在“极端情况”下,才可以说凯恩斯的利率理论是有效的。尽管他正确地指出了凯恩斯理论创新的要点,但他的批评已经在《通论》中得到了含蓄的回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Takotsubo Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside and Bedside to Bench.
IF 3.9 3区 材料科学ACS Applied Electronic MaterialsPub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164704
Francesco Pelliccia, Amalia Morgantini, Riccardo Rosati
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Oxidative Stress-From Bench to Bedside.
IF 5.6 2区 生物学International Journal of Molecular SciencesPub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814126
Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Michał Ciebiera, Ewa E Hennig
Metabolic syndrome and cancer: from bedside to bench and back.
IF 0 Interdisciplinary topics in gerontologyPub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000343621
Martine Extermann
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.
期刊最新文献
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought vol. 30, issue 6 (December 2023) Wartime in the history of economic thought: episodes in European history The Palgrave companion to Oxford economics, Adam Smith: Sytematic Philosopher and Public Thinker James Steuart and the making of Karl Marx’s monetary thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1