Sraffa in historiographical perspective: a provisional statement

IF 0.6 3区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 1998-09-01 DOI:10.1080/10427719800000044
S. Hollander
{"title":"Sraffa in historiographical perspective: a provisional statement","authors":"S. Hollander","doi":"10.1080/10427719800000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several features of Piero Sraffa' Production of Commodities are attributed to David Ricardo by Sraffa himself and by 'neo-Ricardians' generally. I have questioned elsewhere the Sraffian understanding of Ricardo. Assuming this challenge to be justified, the question arises how Sraffa may have erred. I approach the problem by asking: (i) whether his reading can only be rationalized in post-Marxian terms; and (ii) how he arrived at his reading. I conclude that Sraffa did read Ricardo in Marxian fashion; but that all the relevant Sraffian features are to be found in Ricardo though only within a narrowly restricted range of texts.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"5 1","pages":"430-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719800000044","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719800000044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Several features of Piero Sraffa' Production of Commodities are attributed to David Ricardo by Sraffa himself and by 'neo-Ricardians' generally. I have questioned elsewhere the Sraffian understanding of Ricardo. Assuming this challenge to be justified, the question arises how Sraffa may have erred. I approach the problem by asking: (i) whether his reading can only be rationalized in post-Marxian terms; and (ii) how he arrived at his reading. I conclude that Sraffa did read Ricardo in Marxian fashion; but that all the relevant Sraffian features are to be found in Ricardo though only within a narrowly restricted range of texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史学视角下的斯拉法:临时陈述
皮耶罗·斯拉法的《商品生产》中的几个特点被斯拉法本人和一般的“新李嘉图派”归因于大卫·李嘉图。我曾在其他地方质疑过伊拉克人对里卡多的理解。假设这一挑战是合理的,那么问题来了,斯拉法可能犯了什么错误。我通过以下问题来解决这个问题:(I)他的阅读是否只能在后马克思主义的语境中合理化;(二)他是如何得出他的阅读结果的。我的结论是,斯拉法确实以马克思主义的方式阅读了李嘉图;但所有相关的伊拉克特征都可以在李嘉图中找到,尽管只是在一个狭窄的文本范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.
期刊最新文献
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought vol. 30, issue 6 (December 2023) Wartime in the history of economic thought: episodes in European history The Palgrave companion to Oxford economics, Adam Smith: Sytematic Philosopher and Public Thinker James Steuart and the making of Karl Marx’s monetary thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1