University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economics of Innovation and New Technology Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10438599700000006
M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, A. Jaffe
{"title":"University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention","authors":"M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, A. Jaffe","doi":"10.1080/10438599700000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an attempt to quantify key aspects of innovations, 'basicness' and appropriability, and explore the linkages between them. We rely on detailed patent data. particularly on patent citations, thus awarding the proposed measures a very wide coverage. Relying on the prior that universities perform more basic research than corporations, we find that forward-looking measures of 'importance' and 'generality' capture aspects of the basicness of innovations. Similarly, measures of the degree of reliance on scientific sources. and of the closeness to the origins of innovational paths, appear to reflect the basicness of research. As measures of appropriability we use the fraction of citations coming from patents awarded to the sarne inventor, and in fact these measures are much higher for corporations than fbr universities. An examination of a small number of patents that are universally recognized as 'basic' provides further support for these measures. We find also evidence of the existence of 'technologl trajectories'.","PeriodicalId":51485,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","volume":"5 1","pages":"19-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10438599700000006","citationCount":"1118","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599700000006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1118

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to quantify key aspects of innovations, 'basicness' and appropriability, and explore the linkages between them. We rely on detailed patent data. particularly on patent citations, thus awarding the proposed measures a very wide coverage. Relying on the prior that universities perform more basic research than corporations, we find that forward-looking measures of 'importance' and 'generality' capture aspects of the basicness of innovations. Similarly, measures of the degree of reliance on scientific sources. and of the closeness to the origins of innovational paths, appear to reflect the basicness of research. As measures of appropriability we use the fraction of citations coming from patents awarded to the sarne inventor, and in fact these measures are much higher for corporations than fbr universities. An examination of a small number of patents that are universally recognized as 'basic' provides further support for these measures. We find also evidence of the existence of 'technologl trajectories'.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学与企业专利之争:关于发明基础的一个窗口
本文试图量化创新的关键方面,即“基础性”和适宜性,并探讨它们之间的联系。我们依赖于详细的专利数据。特别是在专利引用方面,因此提议的措施覆盖面非常广。基于大学比公司进行更多的基础研究这一先验,我们发现,前瞻性的“重要性”和“普遍性”衡量标准捕捉到了创新的基础方面。同样,衡量对科学来源的依赖程度。而对创新路径起源的接近,似乎反映了研究的基础。作为适当性的衡量标准,我们使用来自授予单个发明人的专利的引用比例,事实上,这些指标在公司中比在大学中高得多。对少数被普遍认为是“基本”专利的审查为这些措施提供了进一步的支持。我们还发现了“技术轨迹”存在的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Economics of Innovation and New Technology is devoted to the theoretical and empirical analysis of the determinants and effects of innovation, new technology and technological knowledge. The journal aims to provide a bridge between different strands of literature and different contributions of economic theory and empirical economics. This bridge is built in two ways. First, by encouraging empirical research (including case studies, econometric work and historical research), evaluating existing economic theory, and suggesting appropriate directions for future effort in theoretical work. Second, by exploring ways of applying and testing existing areas of theory to the economics of innovation and new technology, and ways of using theoretical insights to inform data collection and other empirical research. The journal welcomes contributions across a wide range of issues concerned with innovation, including: the generation of new technological knowledge, innovation in product markets, process innovation, patenting, adoption, diffusion, innovation and technology policy, international competitiveness, standardization and network externalities, innovation and growth, technology transfer, innovation and market structure, innovation and the environment, and across a broad range of economic activity not just in ‘high technology’ areas. The journal is open to a variety of methodological approaches ranging from case studies to econometric exercises with sound theoretical modelling, empirical evidence both longitudinal and cross-sectional about technologies, regions, firms, industries and countries.
期刊最新文献
Digital transition in a turbulent world: European regional growth opportunities in 17 years' time Patent infringement litigation, executive team risk appetite and corporate innovation Synergistic governance and innovation: the positive effect of cross-holding partners Do scarce resource inputs promote or reduce patent values and innovation? A game theory approach R&D lags in economic models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1