Quantitative Assessment of Salmonid Escapement Techniques

A. Parsons, J. Skalski
{"title":"Quantitative Assessment of Salmonid Escapement Techniques","authors":"A. Parsons, J. Skalski","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2010.513020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most reviews of salmonid escapement estimation techniques have been based on logistical considerations or site-specific applications and not on statistical first principles. We reviewed six categories of salmon escapement techniques: area-under-the-curve, carcass abundance, mark-recapture, passage count, peak count, and redd count methods, based on statistical accuracy (i.e., unbiasedness), precision, and the ability to meet model assumptions. Within each of these categories of escapement techniques, we make recommendations on the best approaches to use for valid estimates and suggest five considerations when selecting an escapement estimation method. Currently in the Pacific Northwest, peak spawner counts are the most commonly employed technique and least defensible on a statistical basis than other methods. We recommend statistical accuracy and precision be given higher consideration when monitoring often increasingly scarce salmon resources.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2010.513020","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2010.513020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Most reviews of salmonid escapement estimation techniques have been based on logistical considerations or site-specific applications and not on statistical first principles. We reviewed six categories of salmon escapement techniques: area-under-the-curve, carcass abundance, mark-recapture, passage count, peak count, and redd count methods, based on statistical accuracy (i.e., unbiasedness), precision, and the ability to meet model assumptions. Within each of these categories of escapement techniques, we make recommendations on the best approaches to use for valid estimates and suggest five considerations when selecting an escapement estimation method. Currently in the Pacific Northwest, peak spawner counts are the most commonly employed technique and least defensible on a statistical basis than other methods. We recommend statistical accuracy and precision be given higher consideration when monitoring often increasingly scarce salmon resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲑鱼擒抱技术的定量评价
大多数关于鲑鱼逃逸估计技术的审查都是基于后勤考虑或特定地点的应用,而不是基于统计第一原则。基于统计准确性(即无偏性)、精度和满足模型假设的能力,我们回顾了六种鲑鱼逃逸技术:曲线下面积法、胴体丰度法、标记-再捕获法、通道计数法、峰值计数法和redd计数法。在这些擒纵技术的每个类别中,我们对用于有效估计的最佳方法提出了建议,并在选择擒纵估计方法时提出了五个考虑因素。目前在太平洋西北部,产卵高峰期计数是最常用的技术,在统计基础上比其他方法最不可靠。我们建议在监测往往日益稀少的鲑鱼资源时,应更多地考虑统计的准确性和精确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Reviews in Fisheries Science 农林科学-渔业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biological and Genetic Characteristics of Restocked and Wild Acanthopagrus butcheri (Sparidae) in a Southwestern Australian Estuary Marine Stock Enhancement, Restocking, and Sea Ranching in Australia: Future Directions and a Synthesis of Two Decades of Research and Development The Race for Space: Using Acoustic Telemetry to Understand Density-Dependent Emigration and Habitat Selection in a Released Predatory Fish Generalized Predatory Impact Model: A Numerical Approach for Assessing Trophic Limits to Hatchery Releases and Controlling Related Ecological Risks Overlap of Home Ranges of Resident and Introduced Southern Rock Lobster after Translocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1