Potentials and Limitations of Stock Enhancement in Marine Recreational Fisheries Systems: An Integrative Review of Florida's Red Drum Enhancement

Edward V. Camp, K. Lorenzen, R. Ahrens, L. Barbieri, K. Leber
{"title":"Potentials and Limitations of Stock Enhancement in Marine Recreational Fisheries Systems: An Integrative Review of Florida's Red Drum Enhancement","authors":"Edward V. Camp, K. Lorenzen, R. Ahrens, L. Barbieri, K. Leber","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, an integrative review of the potential for stock enhancement is conducted to support desirable management outcomes in marine recreational fisheries, focusing on the Florida, USA, red drum fishery as a case study. Here, stock enhancement is implicitly seen as a way of simultaneously achieving both ecological objectives of sustained wild fish populations and socioeconomic objectives of high fishing effort and/or catch rates. However, the review suggests that a fundamental tradeoff remains between these objectives in the short-term because stocking of hatchery fish is likely to result in at least partial displacement of wild fish through biological interactions as well as increased fishing pressure. Contrary to the perception of enhancement as a “quick fix,” successful use of the approach in the marine recreational fishery is likely to require sophisticated stock management and some adaptation in governance. In developing the enhancement, it will be necessary to address uncertainty in key attributes, specifically dynamics of recruitment, angler-effort responses, and stakeholder involvement. This may be achieved by combining quantitative modeling, monitoring, and stocking experiments in an active adaptive management framework to consider enhancement in the context of alternative management strategies. It is suggested that any interim enhancement should minimize ecological risk per socioeconomic benefit by stocking larger fish in areas where high fishing mortality limits abundance of wild fish. These conclusions are largely generalizable to other recreational enhancements, and this work serves as a model of rarely published a priori enhancement evaluation.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"388 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

In this study, an integrative review of the potential for stock enhancement is conducted to support desirable management outcomes in marine recreational fisheries, focusing on the Florida, USA, red drum fishery as a case study. Here, stock enhancement is implicitly seen as a way of simultaneously achieving both ecological objectives of sustained wild fish populations and socioeconomic objectives of high fishing effort and/or catch rates. However, the review suggests that a fundamental tradeoff remains between these objectives in the short-term because stocking of hatchery fish is likely to result in at least partial displacement of wild fish through biological interactions as well as increased fishing pressure. Contrary to the perception of enhancement as a “quick fix,” successful use of the approach in the marine recreational fishery is likely to require sophisticated stock management and some adaptation in governance. In developing the enhancement, it will be necessary to address uncertainty in key attributes, specifically dynamics of recruitment, angler-effort responses, and stakeholder involvement. This may be achieved by combining quantitative modeling, monitoring, and stocking experiments in an active adaptive management framework to consider enhancement in the context of alternative management strategies. It is suggested that any interim enhancement should minimize ecological risk per socioeconomic benefit by stocking larger fish in areas where high fishing mortality limits abundance of wild fish. These conclusions are largely generalizable to other recreational enhancements, and this work serves as a model of rarely published a priori enhancement evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海洋休闲渔业系统中种群增加的潜力和局限性:佛罗里达红鼓鱼种群增加的综合评价
在这项研究中,为了支持海洋休闲渔业的理想管理成果,对种群增加的潜力进行了综合审查,重点以美国佛罗里达州的红鼓渔业为案例研究。在这里,种群增加被含蓄地视为同时实现维持野生鱼类种群的生态目标和高捕捞努力量和/或捕捞率的社会经济目标的一种方式。然而,审查表明,在短期内,这些目标之间仍然存在一个基本的权衡,因为放养孵化场鱼类很可能通过生物相互作用和捕捞压力增加导致野生鱼类至少部分被取代。与将增强视为“权宜之计”的看法相反,在海洋休闲渔业中成功使用这种方法可能需要复杂的种群管理和管理方面的一些调整。在开发增强功能的过程中,有必要解决关键属性的不确定性,特别是招聘动态、垂钓者努力响应和利益相关者参与。这可以通过在主动适应性管理框架中结合定量建模、监测和放养实验来实现,以考虑在替代管理策略的背景下进行增强。建议通过在高捕鱼死亡率限制野生鱼类丰度的地区放养更大的鱼类,将每社会经济效益的生态风险降至最低。这些结论在很大程度上可以推广到其他娱乐性增强,并且这项工作可以作为很少发表的先验增强评估的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Reviews in Fisheries Science 农林科学-渔业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biological and Genetic Characteristics of Restocked and Wild Acanthopagrus butcheri (Sparidae) in a Southwestern Australian Estuary Marine Stock Enhancement, Restocking, and Sea Ranching in Australia: Future Directions and a Synthesis of Two Decades of Research and Development The Race for Space: Using Acoustic Telemetry to Understand Density-Dependent Emigration and Habitat Selection in a Released Predatory Fish Generalized Predatory Impact Model: A Numerical Approach for Assessing Trophic Limits to Hatchery Releases and Controlling Related Ecological Risks Overlap of Home Ranges of Resident and Introduced Southern Rock Lobster after Translocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1