Biotechnology in the face of conservatism and bad faith

Q1 Arts and Humanities Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2015-01-02 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2015.1005922
L. Houdebine
{"title":"Biotechnology in the face of conservatism and bad faith","authors":"L. Houdebine","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2015.1005922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science and technology continue to generate discoveries and innovations that provide the public with new knowledge, new drugs, and new products. A growing number of regulatory guidelines protect users from the deleterious side effects of these new processes and products. Lifespans are still increasing each year in rich countries. Nevertheless, a proportion of the people are worried and upset. The discovery that humans are not at the center of the world has destabilized the traditional belief in a benevolent Creator. The current economic crisis also reinforces a sense of instability. The majority of people are still waiting for improvements in their lives from innovation. Thus, a contrast between anxiety and hope remains dominant. Scientific and technological advances have led to growing protests, a mindset that seems disproportionate to the actual risks. Some environmentalists take advantage of the situation to artificially generate systematic fear in order to destroy, or at least block, the development of Western civilization, to prevent or delay the irreversible degradation of the planet. This is based on a strategy of conflict and intolerance. A new pact between citizens, science, technology, and industry remains to be found.","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"14 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11287462.2015.1005922","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2015.1005922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science and technology continue to generate discoveries and innovations that provide the public with new knowledge, new drugs, and new products. A growing number of regulatory guidelines protect users from the deleterious side effects of these new processes and products. Lifespans are still increasing each year in rich countries. Nevertheless, a proportion of the people are worried and upset. The discovery that humans are not at the center of the world has destabilized the traditional belief in a benevolent Creator. The current economic crisis also reinforces a sense of instability. The majority of people are still waiting for improvements in their lives from innovation. Thus, a contrast between anxiety and hope remains dominant. Scientific and technological advances have led to growing protests, a mindset that seems disproportionate to the actual risks. Some environmentalists take advantage of the situation to artificially generate systematic fear in order to destroy, or at least block, the development of Western civilization, to prevent or delay the irreversible degradation of the planet. This is based on a strategy of conflict and intolerance. A new pact between citizens, science, technology, and industry remains to be found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对保守主义和恶意的生物技术
科学技术不断产生发现和创新,为公众提供新知识、新药和新产品。越来越多的监管指导方针保护用户免受这些新工艺和产品的有害副作用。在富裕国家,人们的寿命每年都在增加。尽管如此,还是有一部分人感到担忧和不安。人类并非世界中心的发现动摇了人们对仁慈造物主的传统信仰。当前的经济危机也强化了一种不稳定的感觉。大多数人仍在等待创新改善他们的生活。因此,焦虑和希望之间的对比仍然占主导地位。科技进步导致了越来越多的抗议活动,这种心态似乎与实际风险不成比例。一些环保主义者利用这种情况,人为地制造系统性的恐惧,以破坏或至少阻碍西方文明的发展,防止或延缓地球不可逆转的退化。这是基于一种冲突和不容忍的战略。公民、科学、技术和工业之间的新协议仍有待找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can biosampling really be "non-invasive"? An examination of the socially invasive nature of physically non-invasive biosampling in urban and rural Malawi. The expressivist argument for recent policy changes regarding the provision of prenatal testing in Japan. A youth advisory group on health and health research in rural Cambodia. May Artificial Intelligence take health and sustainability on a honeymoon? Towards green technologies for multidimensional health and environmental justice. Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1