The Road Less Traveled: Assessing the Impact of Virtual Research Consultations on Online Doctoral Student Persistence

Sherry Mohr, Amanda Ziegler, Tara J. Lehan, John Wengel
{"title":"The Road Less Traveled: Assessing the Impact of Virtual Research Consultations on Online Doctoral Student Persistence","authors":"Sherry Mohr, Amanda Ziegler, Tara J. Lehan, John Wengel","doi":"10.1080/10875301.2022.2072043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As academic institutions nationwide experience higher online enrollment rates, virtual research consultations present online students with an opportunity to connect meaningfully in a personal interaction with a librarian and receive direct instruction. As libraries transition this staple of information literacy instruction from an in-person to an online offering, analysis of impact in the online environment is key. Little is known about the impact of this service on student outcomes, such as program completion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of participation in a research consultation on program completion among doctoral students working on their dissertation at an online university. A quantitative methodology and causal-comparative design were employed. Findings showed that, although they had a significantly higher GPA in their dissertation courses than a matched sample, students who participated in a research consultation were not significantly more likely to complete their program. This finding is significant, as it suggests that library research consultations should not be viewed as retention/completion initiatives. Instead, given the higher GPAs of students who participated in a research consultation, they might more appropriately be considered as initiatives that can enhance learning, especially in relation to information literacy.","PeriodicalId":35377,"journal":{"name":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2022.2072043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract As academic institutions nationwide experience higher online enrollment rates, virtual research consultations present online students with an opportunity to connect meaningfully in a personal interaction with a librarian and receive direct instruction. As libraries transition this staple of information literacy instruction from an in-person to an online offering, analysis of impact in the online environment is key. Little is known about the impact of this service on student outcomes, such as program completion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of participation in a research consultation on program completion among doctoral students working on their dissertation at an online university. A quantitative methodology and causal-comparative design were employed. Findings showed that, although they had a significantly higher GPA in their dissertation courses than a matched sample, students who participated in a research consultation were not significantly more likely to complete their program. This finding is significant, as it suggests that library research consultations should not be viewed as retention/completion initiatives. Instead, given the higher GPAs of students who participated in a research consultation, they might more appropriately be considered as initiatives that can enhance learning, especially in relation to information literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少走的路:评估虚拟研究咨询对在线博士生坚持的影响
随着全国学术机构在线入学率的提高,虚拟研究咨询为在线学生提供了一个与图书管理员进行有意义的个人互动并接受直接指导的机会。随着图书馆将这种主要的信息素养教学从面对面的授课转变为在线授课,分析在线环境的影响是关键。人们对这项服务对学生成绩的影响知之甚少,比如课程完成情况。本研究的目的是调查参与研究咨询对在线大学博士学位论文完成的影响。采用定量方法和因果比较设计。研究结果显示,虽然他们在论文课程上的平均成绩明显高于匹配样本,但参加研究咨询的学生完成课程的可能性并不明显更高。这一发现意义重大,因为它表明图书馆研究磋商不应被视为保留/完成倡议。相反,考虑到参加研究咨询的学生的gpa较高,他们可能更合适地被视为可以提高学习的举措,特别是在信息素养方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
Internet Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Internet Reference Services Quarterly tackles the tough job of keeping librarians up to date with the latest developments in Internet referencing and librarianship. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal is designed to function as a comprehensive information source librarians can turn to and count on for keeping up-to-date on emerging technological innovations, while emphasizing theoretical, research, and practical applications of Internet-related information services, sources, and resources. Librarians from any size or type of library in any discipline get the knowledge needed on how to best improve service through one of the most powerful reference tools available on the Internet.
期刊最新文献
Enriching Bibliographic Records Using AI – A Pilot by Ex Libris Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators “ChatGPT Assists Me in My Reference List:” Exploring the Chatbot’s Potential as Citation Formatting Tool Information Literacy Instruction Services at Rural Community Colleges, Fall 2019 Through AY 2021/22 “Don’t Let Grammarly Overwrite Your Style and Voice:” Writers’ Advice on Using Grammarly in Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1