{"title":"Can legislation mandating vaccination solve the challenges of routine childhood immunisation in Nigeria?","authors":"Cheluchi Onyemelukwe","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Nigeria, childhood mortality is very high, with almost a million children dying each year. A fifth of these die from vaccine-preventable diseases. The role of immunisation in preventing childhood morbidity and mortality is widely recognised. Unfortunately little, if any, account has been given of the law’s role in immunisation in legal discourse in Nigeria. Yet recent steps have been taken at both federal and state levels to compel immunisation using the instrument of legislation. For instance, the Child Rights Act, a domestication of the Convention of the Rights of the Child, passed in 2003 includes provisions compelling immunisation. Also, several states in Nigeria like Jigawa, Niger and Katsina States, have recently enacted legislation that makes childhood immunisation compulsory under the law. These pieces of legislation criminalise refusal to immunise children and also public statements that discourage immunisation. I identify the challenges that limit or obstruct uptake of immunisation in Nigeria and ask what role the law can play in providing solutions to these challenges. I examine the ways in which the law has been engaged to promote immunisation, the impact of law and the limits of legislative intervention. I also suggest ways to improve the law’s effectiveness in this essential public health matter.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"100 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2016.1244450","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2016.1244450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
ABSTRACT In Nigeria, childhood mortality is very high, with almost a million children dying each year. A fifth of these die from vaccine-preventable diseases. The role of immunisation in preventing childhood morbidity and mortality is widely recognised. Unfortunately little, if any, account has been given of the law’s role in immunisation in legal discourse in Nigeria. Yet recent steps have been taken at both federal and state levels to compel immunisation using the instrument of legislation. For instance, the Child Rights Act, a domestication of the Convention of the Rights of the Child, passed in 2003 includes provisions compelling immunisation. Also, several states in Nigeria like Jigawa, Niger and Katsina States, have recently enacted legislation that makes childhood immunisation compulsory under the law. These pieces of legislation criminalise refusal to immunise children and also public statements that discourage immunisation. I identify the challenges that limit or obstruct uptake of immunisation in Nigeria and ask what role the law can play in providing solutions to these challenges. I examine the ways in which the law has been engaged to promote immunisation, the impact of law and the limits of legislative intervention. I also suggest ways to improve the law’s effectiveness in this essential public health matter.
在尼日利亚,儿童死亡率非常高,每年有近100万儿童死亡。其中五分之一死于疫苗可预防的疾病。免疫接种在预防儿童发病率和死亡率方面的作用已得到广泛承认。不幸的是,在尼日利亚的法律论述中,很少(如果有的话)考虑到法律在免疫方面的作用。然而,最近在联邦和州一级采取了一些措施,利用立法手段强制进行免疫接种。例如,2003年通过的《儿童权利法案》(Child Rights Act)是对《儿童权利公约》(Convention of the Rights of the Child)的改编,其中包括强制接种疫苗的条款。此外,尼日利亚的几个州,如吉加瓦州、尼日尔州和卡齐纳州,最近颁布了立法,根据法律规定儿童免疫接种是强制性的。这些立法将拒绝给儿童接种疫苗和不鼓励接种疫苗的公开声明定为刑事犯罪。我确定了在尼日利亚限制或阻碍免疫接种的挑战,并询问法律在提供应对这些挑战的解决方案方面可以发挥什么作用。我研究了法律促进免疫接种的方式,法律的影响和立法干预的局限性。我还建议如何提高法律在这一重要公共卫生问题上的有效性。