An Examination of Positive Impression Management Validity Scales in the Context of Parenting Capacity Assessments

J. Harper, F. Schmidt, L. J. Cuttress, D. Mazmanian
{"title":"An Examination of Positive Impression Management Validity Scales in the Context of Parenting Capacity Assessments","authors":"J. Harper, F. Schmidt, L. J. Cuttress, D. Mazmanian","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"102 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极印象管理效度量表在父母教养能力评估中的检验
虽然专业人士进行父母能力评估(PCAs)经常依赖于测试效度量表来衡量父母在社会期望方面的努力,但关于他们的表现的数据非常有限。本研究发现人格评估量表(PAI)与百万临床多轴量表- iii (MCMI-III)效度量表具有较强的并发效度。研究结果也与之前的研究一致,即父母参与了某种程度的印象管理。然而,与MCMI-III或之前在明尼苏达多相人格量表-2 (MMPI-2)中发表的研究相比,PAI似乎识别出从事积极印象管理的父母要少得多。并提出了未来在pca中使用效度量表的方向和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study Medical Knowledge-Related Suicide in Hemodialysis Therapy Among Older Adults with Severe Comorbidities - A Case Report The Role of Nurses in the Implementation of Positive Behavior Support in a Secure Forensic Setting ‘Honor’ and Its Upholders: Perpetrator Types in ‘Honor’-Based Abuse Exploring Extreme Violence: Forensic and Psychiatric Analysis of Overkill and Brutal Homicide Cases in Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1