The Name of the Rose and Criminal Profiling: The Benefits of ViCAP and ViCLAS

Richard N Kocsis
{"title":"The Name of the Rose and Criminal Profiling: The Benefits of ViCAP and ViCLAS","authors":"Richard N Kocsis","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2014.986706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the continued growth in both the research and practice into criminal profiling, three major shortfalls continue to permeate the topic. The first is a lack of coherency in the field which has, as a consequence, led to increasingly discordant and contradictory theorems. In many respects this problem is connotative of the adage comparing apples with oranges. Likewise, the adage the elephant in the room describes the second major shortfall concerning a paucity of research testing the validity (i.e., accuracy) of espoused paradigms. Finally, the adage too many cooks spoil the broth describes the third major shortfall concerning the counterproductive popular interest surrounding the topic. These shortfalls when examined collectively appear to form a self-perpetuating cycle. The use of violent crime databases such as ViCAP and ViCLAS are suggested as potential mechanisms in arresting this cycle by rectifying these factors, which continue to stymie the cogent scientific development of criminal profiling.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"58 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2014.986706","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.986706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Despite the continued growth in both the research and practice into criminal profiling, three major shortfalls continue to permeate the topic. The first is a lack of coherency in the field which has, as a consequence, led to increasingly discordant and contradictory theorems. In many respects this problem is connotative of the adage comparing apples with oranges. Likewise, the adage the elephant in the room describes the second major shortfall concerning a paucity of research testing the validity (i.e., accuracy) of espoused paradigms. Finally, the adage too many cooks spoil the broth describes the third major shortfall concerning the counterproductive popular interest surrounding the topic. These shortfalls when examined collectively appear to form a self-perpetuating cycle. The use of violent crime databases such as ViCAP and ViCLAS are suggested as potential mechanisms in arresting this cycle by rectifying these factors, which continue to stymie the cogent scientific development of criminal profiling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玫瑰的名字和罪犯侧写:ViCAP和ViCLAS的好处
尽管对犯罪侧写的研究和实践不断增长,但这一主题仍然存在三个主要不足。首先是该领域缺乏一致性,这导致了越来越多的不一致和矛盾的定理。在许多方面,这个问题隐含着拿苹果和橘子作比较的谚语。同样,“房间里的大象”这句谚语描述了第二个主要不足,即缺乏对所支持的范式的有效性(即准确性)进行测试的研究。最后,“厨师多了反而坏了汤”这句谚语描述了第三个主要不足,即围绕这个话题的公众兴趣适得其反。这些不足之处综合起来,似乎形成了一个自我延续的循环。使用暴力犯罪数据库,如ViCAP和ViCLAS,被认为是通过纠正这些因素来阻止这种循环的潜在机制,这些因素继续阻碍犯罪侧写的有说服力的科学发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study Medical Knowledge-Related Suicide in Hemodialysis Therapy Among Older Adults with Severe Comorbidities - A Case Report The Role of Nurses in the Implementation of Positive Behavior Support in a Secure Forensic Setting ‘Honor’ and Its Upholders: Perpetrator Types in ‘Honor’-Based Abuse Exploring Extreme Violence: Forensic and Psychiatric Analysis of Overkill and Brutal Homicide Cases in Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1