Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century

IF 0.5 Q1 Arts and Humanities Intellectual History Review Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968
Andrea Sangiacomo
{"title":"Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century","authors":"Andrea Sangiacomo","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"771 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教、启蒙运动与帝国:18世纪英国人对印度教的诠释
意向性结构,是个体本质的知识。因此,人们可能会想,斯宾诺莎是否真的会批评,而不是赞同非二元性的观点,因为它试图否认任何思维活动的基本结构(其意向性)。这些问题在目前的斯宾诺莎学术研究中很少被讨论,即使卡莱尔在这方面没有得出最终结论(这样的结论会被得出吗?),她的书的一大优点是,它把这些问题提到了桌面上,承认了它们的重要性,甚至可能提醒读者,是时候直面这些问题了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual History Review
Intellectual History Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
The translation of Saints and the Confucian discourse of sages in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century China: the examples of Alfonso Vagnone, Zhang Xingyao and Yan Mo Transwriting in Aleni’s Xingxue cushu : communicating the philosophy of human nature between the West and late Ming China From sanctus to shengren : mediating Christian and Chinese concepts of human excellence in early modern China Mandeville’s fable: pride, hypocrisy, and sociability Mandeville’s fable: pride, hypocrisy, and sociability , by Robin Douglass, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2023, 256 pp., £30(hb), ISBN 9780691219172 De Peccato Originali (On Original Sin 1679) De Peccato Originali (On Original Sin 1679) , by Hadriaan Beverland, annotated, edited and translated into English by Karen Eline Hollewand and Floris Verhaart, Leiden, Brill, 2023, xxi+365 pp., €119.00(hb), ISBN 978-90-04-34285-9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1