End of life care and decision making: how far we have come, how far we have to go.

Abstract

While enormous progress has been made in improving the quality of care and the decision-making process for patients at the end of life, as a society we still have far to go to ensure that dying patients and their families have a comfortable and dignified death. In particular, reexamination and reconfiguration of our current decision framework is essential as our elderly population with chronic disease and slowly fatal conditions expands. With less certain disease paths and more complex and ambiguous choices, the growth of this geriatric population challenges us to develop a broader conceptualization of end of life care planning, so that end of life considerations are integrated into a larger anticipatory framework addressing options and needs as patients gradually decline. Within this framework hospice becomes a natural, integrated option along a continuum of care planning, rather than an abrupt alternative at a late stage of illness. End of life care planning must positively anticipate a robust array of needs and concerns well beyond the dramatic decisions to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging technologies usually found in advance directives. To embrace this broader framework it is critical that primary care physicians as well as disease specialists receive training in fundamental aspects of both geriatric and palliative care. Professionals from both of these disciplines must share expertise with each other, and should collaborate in advocacy efforts to effectuate changes in the clinical, policy and legislative arenas.