You of All People Ask Me? Public Archaeology is You: A Response to Grima and the Wider Debate on the Meaning of Public Archaeology

IF 0.8 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Public Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841
Jaime Almansa Sánchez
{"title":"You of All People Ask Me? Public Archaeology is You: A Response to Grima and the Wider Debate on the Meaning of Public Archaeology","authors":"Jaime Almansa Sánchez","doi":"10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the broader debate to (re)define public archaeology, Grima's (2016) paper calls for an archaeology embedded in public archaeology, thereby focusing on this avenue of expansion instead of its own development as a singular discipline. Not fully rejecting this idea, this short paper aims to situate the debate a step beyond, towards a slightly different approach. Employing a historiographical perspective, it is argued that complementary visions about public archaeology help to enrich the discipline.","PeriodicalId":45023,"journal":{"name":"Public Archaeology","volume":"15 1","pages":"141 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Within the broader debate to (re)define public archaeology, Grima's (2016) paper calls for an archaeology embedded in public archaeology, thereby focusing on this avenue of expansion instead of its own development as a singular discipline. Not fully rejecting this idea, this short paper aims to situate the debate a step beyond, towards a slightly different approach. Employing a historiographical perspective, it is argued that complementary visions about public archaeology help to enrich the discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是你问我的吗?《公共考古学就是你:对格里玛的回应及对公共考古学意义的广泛争论
在(重新)定义公共考古学的更广泛辩论中,Grima(2016)的论文呼吁将考古学嵌入公共考古学中,从而将重点放在这一扩展途径上,而不是将其自身发展为一门单一学科。这篇短文并没有完全否定这一观点,而是旨在将辩论推向一个稍微不同的方向。采用史学的观点,认为关于公共考古学的互补观点有助于丰富这一学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Archaeology
Public Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Names of the Dead: Identity, Privacy and the Ethics of Anonymity in Exhibiting the Dead Body Archaeological History, Memory, and Heritage at the White Marl Site, Central Village, St Catherine Parish, Jamaica ‘Perspectives in Maritime Archaeology’: Challenging Popular Perceptions through Online Learning Heritage under Siege: The Case of Gaza and a Mysterious Apollo Critical Approaches to Heritage for Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1