An Evaluation of Achieving Condom Empowerment (ACE)-Plus in Foster Care Agencies in New York City

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH American Journal of Sexuality Education Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1080/15546128.2021.1959473
Scott Herrling, Heather Hirsch
{"title":"An Evaluation of Achieving Condom Empowerment (ACE)-Plus in Foster Care Agencies in New York City","authors":"Scott Herrling, Heather Hirsch","doi":"10.1080/15546128.2021.1959473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To test the ACE-Plus curriculum, a two-session program that teaches males in foster care and/or preventive services about correct and consistent condom use, and engagement with female partners to obtain and use contraception. Methods Nine foster care agencies in New York City randomly assigned 223 males aged 16–20 to the ACE-Plus intervention or a benign program. Youth completed surveys at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up. Regression analyses assessed the effects of program participation on condom use, use of hormonal birth control method, use of birth control by female sex partner(s), obtaining birth control with a sex partner(s), and communication about birth control with a sex partner(s). Results At 3-month follow-up, treatment youth were significantly more likely than control youth to report communicating with their sexual partner(s) about birth control (p = .0062). While not statistically significant, treatment youth were more likely to report obtaining birth control with a sex partner(s) than control youth at 3-month follow-up. Impact estimates for the remaining behavioral outcomes favored the control group, though not significantly. Implementation data suggest the program was delivered with fidelity. Conclusion Based on these mixed results, perhaps more developmental research into this short-duration intervention for this high-needs population is necessary.","PeriodicalId":45712,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sexuality Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15546128.2021.1959473","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sexuality Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2021.1959473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To test the ACE-Plus curriculum, a two-session program that teaches males in foster care and/or preventive services about correct and consistent condom use, and engagement with female partners to obtain and use contraception. Methods Nine foster care agencies in New York City randomly assigned 223 males aged 16–20 to the ACE-Plus intervention or a benign program. Youth completed surveys at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up. Regression analyses assessed the effects of program participation on condom use, use of hormonal birth control method, use of birth control by female sex partner(s), obtaining birth control with a sex partner(s), and communication about birth control with a sex partner(s). Results At 3-month follow-up, treatment youth were significantly more likely than control youth to report communicating with their sexual partner(s) about birth control (p = .0062). While not statistically significant, treatment youth were more likely to report obtaining birth control with a sex partner(s) than control youth at 3-month follow-up. Impact estimates for the remaining behavioral outcomes favored the control group, though not significantly. Implementation data suggest the program was delivered with fidelity. Conclusion Based on these mixed results, perhaps more developmental research into this short-duration intervention for this high-needs population is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在纽约市寄养机构实现避孕套授权(ACE)-Plus的评估
目的测试ACE-Plus课程,这是一个两节课的课程,向寄养和/或预防服务中的男性教授正确和一致的安全套使用,以及与女性伴侣接触以获得和使用避孕措施。方法纽约市9家寄养机构随机分配223名16-20岁的男性参加ACE-Plus干预或良性项目。青少年在基线、3个月随访和9个月随访时完成调查。回归分析评估了项目参与对安全套使用、激素避孕方法使用、女性性伴侣使用避孕措施、与性伴侣获得避孕措施以及与性伴侣沟通避孕措施的影响。结果在3个月的随访中,治疗组青少年报告与性伴侣进行节育沟通的可能性显著高于对照组青少年(p = 0.0062)。虽然没有统计学意义,但在3个月的随访中,接受治疗的青少年比对照组青少年更有可能报告与性伴侣一起避孕。对其余行为结果的影响估计偏向于对照组,尽管不是很明显。执行数据表明,该计划是忠实地交付的。基于这些混杂的结果,也许有必要对这种针对高需求人群的短期干预进行更多的发展研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Sexuality Education
American Journal of Sexuality Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Sexuality Education speaks directly to the distinct, professional needs of sexuality educators and trainers. This peer-reviewed journal provides sexuality educators and trainers with current research about sexuality education programming, best practices, sample lesson plans, reports on curriculum development and assessment, literature reviews, scholarly commentary, educational program reports, media reviews (books, videos, internet resources, and curricula), and letters to the editor. The American Journal of Sexuality Education addresses a variety of sexuality topics and audiences, presenting up-to-date theory and practice, lessons, and evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Priority Needs of Educators in Delivering Sexuality Education to High School Students with Intellectual Disabilities Examining Conservative Attitudes in AI Conversations About Teen Sexting Scaling up, Sustaining, and Enhancing School-Based Sexuality Education Programs in Resource Constrained and Conservative Contexts: Replicable Lessons from Positive-Deviant Countries Teachers’ Attitudes and Opinions Toward Sexuality Education in School: A Systematic Review of Secondary and High School Teachers Digital Game Interventions to Improve Adolescent Reproductive Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1