Design and analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and floating column-supported embankments

IF 2.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.1080/19386362.2021.1997209
T. Pham
{"title":"Design and analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and floating column-supported embankments","authors":"T. Pham","doi":"10.1080/19386362.2021.1997209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported system is an economic and effective solution to support embankments constructed on soft soils. In this solution, both end-bearing and floating columns are commonly used in practice. For deep soil foundation depths, floating columns are more economical than end-bearing piles. The design of a floating column foundation involves complex soil–structure interactions and there are still no clear uniform guidelines available for the design of embankments supported by floating columns. The main focus of this paper is to present a design method for the geosynthetic-reinforced floating column-supported (GRFCs) embankments. The main features of the proposed method are combining the bearing capacity theory for the floating columns, the arching theory for fill soils, the tensioned membrane theory for the geosynthetic, and considering interaction models between geosynthetic, soil, and piles. Using the proposed method, the influences of the pile geometry, soft clay, geosynthetic, and embankment fills properties were investigated. It was observed that the geosynthetic membrane inclusion enhances the load transfer mechanism and reduces significantly the differential settlements of floating pile-supported embankments. The floating columns with a higher ultimate bearing capacity cause more soil arching. In general, the soil shear strength properties and column geometry (length, diameter, column spacing) have a strong influence on the GRFCs embankment behaviour. Finally, the proposed method is compared with the BS 8006–1 and EBGEO design standards considering several experimental and numerical models to investigate its validity. The results showed that the proposed method is able of very good prediction performance and allows conducting the design optimization of GRFCs embankment.","PeriodicalId":47238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"1276 - 1292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2021.1997209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported system is an economic and effective solution to support embankments constructed on soft soils. In this solution, both end-bearing and floating columns are commonly used in practice. For deep soil foundation depths, floating columns are more economical than end-bearing piles. The design of a floating column foundation involves complex soil–structure interactions and there are still no clear uniform guidelines available for the design of embankments supported by floating columns. The main focus of this paper is to present a design method for the geosynthetic-reinforced floating column-supported (GRFCs) embankments. The main features of the proposed method are combining the bearing capacity theory for the floating columns, the arching theory for fill soils, the tensioned membrane theory for the geosynthetic, and considering interaction models between geosynthetic, soil, and piles. Using the proposed method, the influences of the pile geometry, soft clay, geosynthetic, and embankment fills properties were investigated. It was observed that the geosynthetic membrane inclusion enhances the load transfer mechanism and reduces significantly the differential settlements of floating pile-supported embankments. The floating columns with a higher ultimate bearing capacity cause more soil arching. In general, the soil shear strength properties and column geometry (length, diameter, column spacing) have a strong influence on the GRFCs embankment behaviour. Finally, the proposed method is compared with the BS 8006–1 and EBGEO design standards considering several experimental and numerical models to investigate its validity. The results showed that the proposed method is able of very good prediction performance and allows conducting the design optimization of GRFCs embankment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土工合成筋浮柱支撑路堤设计与分析
土工合成筋柱支撑体系是一种经济有效的软土路堤支护方案。在此解决方案中,端承和浮柱在实践中都是常用的。对于较深的地基深度,浮柱比端承桩更经济。浮柱基础的设计涉及复杂的土-结构相互作用,对于浮柱支撑路堤的设计,目前还没有明确统一的指导原则。本文的主要重点是提出一种土工合成筋浮柱支撑(grfc)堤防的设计方法。该方法的主要特点是结合了浮柱的承载力理论、填土的拱理论、土工合成材料的张拉膜理论,并考虑了土工合成材料、土和桩之间的相互作用模型。利用所提出的方法,研究了桩体几何形状、软土、土工合成材料和路堤填筑物性能的影响。结果表明,土工合成膜包合物增强了荷载传递机制,显著降低了浮桩支撑路堤的差异沉降。极限承载力越高的浮柱引起的土拱越大。一般来说,土的抗剪强度特性和柱的几何形状(长度、直径、柱间距)对grfc路堤的性能有很强的影响。最后,将该方法与BS 8006-1和EBGEO设计标准进行了实验和数值模拟,验证了该方法的有效性。结果表明,该方法具有较好的预测性能,可对grfc路基进行设计优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
De-carbonizing in construction using supplementary cementitious materials and accelerated carbonation technique - a review Assessment of p-y response of a laterally loaded single pile embedded in two-layered cohesionless substrata with inclined interface Optimization of water repellency in soils for geotechnical applications SWRC interpretation of iron ore tailings blends focusing on saturation assessment of dry stacking Influence of residual stress and soil dilatancy on the load capacity of jacked pile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1