A Review of Traumatic Narcissism: Relational Systems of Subjugation

D. Orange
{"title":"A Review of Traumatic Narcissism: Relational Systems of Subjugation","authors":"D. Orange","doi":"10.1080/15551024.2015.1043846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H einz Kohut taught us to understand ourselves as narcissists, all, more or less, vulnerable to fragmentation depending on our early relational luck and later selfobject resources. Thinking developmentally, he stretched the reach of our empathic grasp, and thus of psychoanalysis, to include treatment of many sufferers1 previously excluded as unanalyzable. Now comes Daniel Shaw (2014), writing in his own firm voice but with resonances also from Ferenczi, Suttie, Balint, Fairbairn, Loewald, and Winnicott,2 describing the narcissist run amok. He tells us that, when despotic parents, cult leaders, totalitarians in political systems, or authoritarians in psychoanalytic institutes wreak their havoc, the next generation will need our care and understanding in ways quite specific to these “relational systems of subjugation.” This book belongs on my shelf between Leonard Shengold’s Soul Murder (Shengold, 1989) and Bernard Brandchaft’s pathological accommodation work (Brandchaft, Doctors, and Sorter, 2010). To these irreplaceable resources, Shaw adds not only his extensive studies of the precise mechanisms of soul destruction in cults and cult-like groups (such as allegedly therapeutic cults and the large group awareness trainings","PeriodicalId":91515,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15551024.2015.1043846","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2015.1043846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

H einz Kohut taught us to understand ourselves as narcissists, all, more or less, vulnerable to fragmentation depending on our early relational luck and later selfobject resources. Thinking developmentally, he stretched the reach of our empathic grasp, and thus of psychoanalysis, to include treatment of many sufferers1 previously excluded as unanalyzable. Now comes Daniel Shaw (2014), writing in his own firm voice but with resonances also from Ferenczi, Suttie, Balint, Fairbairn, Loewald, and Winnicott,2 describing the narcissist run amok. He tells us that, when despotic parents, cult leaders, totalitarians in political systems, or authoritarians in psychoanalytic institutes wreak their havoc, the next generation will need our care and understanding in ways quite specific to these “relational systems of subjugation.” This book belongs on my shelf between Leonard Shengold’s Soul Murder (Shengold, 1989) and Bernard Brandchaft’s pathological accommodation work (Brandchaft, Doctors, and Sorter, 2010). To these irreplaceable resources, Shaw adds not only his extensive studies of the precise mechanisms of soul destruction in cults and cult-like groups (such as allegedly therapeutic cults and the large group awareness trainings
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性自恋述评:从属关系系统
海因茨·科胡特教会我们把自己理解为自恋者,所有人或多或少都容易受到分裂的影响,这取决于我们早期的关系运气和后来的自我客体资源。从发展的角度思考,他扩展了我们的共情把握的范围,从而扩展了精神分析的范围,包括对许多以前被排除为不可分析的患者的治疗。现在是丹尼尔·肖(Daniel Shaw)(2014),他以自己坚定的声音写作,但也与费伦齐、苏蒂、巴林特、费尔贝恩、洛瓦尔德和温尼科特产生了共鸣,2描述了疯狂的自恋者。他告诉我们,当专制的父母、邪教领袖、政治系统中的极权主义者或精神分析机构中的威权主义者肆虐时,下一代将需要我们以这些“从属关系系统”特有的方式来关心和理解。这本书应该放在我的书架上,夹在伦纳德·圣戈尔德的《灵魂谋杀》(圣戈尔德,1989)和伯纳德·布兰查夫特的《病理适应》(布兰查夫特,医生和分类师,2010)之间。对于这些不可替代的资源,Shaw不仅补充了他对邪教和类似邪教组织(如所谓的治疗邪教和大型团体意识训练)中灵魂毁灭的精确机制的广泛研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Page EOV Racializing Kohut’s “Guilty Man” and “Tragic Man”: Serious Play in the Service of Inclusiveness The End of Comparative Psychoanalysis? Blurring the Boundaries Between Contemporary Theories From Self-Protection to Relational Protectiveness: The Modification of Defensive Structures The Self as a Process of Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1