Establishing the Therapeutic Impact of Empathy Through “Affect Sharing”

Bruce Herzog
{"title":"Establishing the Therapeutic Impact of Empathy Through “Affect Sharing”","authors":"Bruce Herzog","doi":"10.1080/15551024.2016.1141609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What if the enduring desire of the psychoanalytic discipline to be seen as scientific provoked the suppression of certain therapeutic practices? It would explain why Kohut defined empathy only as a mode of clinical observation when he began discussing it, because even that proposal risked being seen as unscientific and controversial. Today, there exists a more favorable professional atmosphere, which should allow for empathic phenomena to now be included in a theory of cure. Clinical examples in this article demonstrate how “affect sharing” can be used in this way. Affect sharing occurs when the therapist believes he or she is reverberating with the affect the patient feels, resulting from a “sharing” selfobject transference, the aim of which is to elicit a shared emotional state with the therapist. In “descriptive affect sharing,” therapists are encouraged to feel what their patients are feeling when listening to their patients’ evocative descriptions. In “active affect sharing,” an activity introduced by the patient can lead to a shared emotional experience within the analytic dyad. These patient-initiated empathic events are experienced as having been shared when the therapist communicates—verbally or non-verbally, directly or indirectly—that affect sharing has occurred. Incrementally escalating affective communications are defined as “reciprocal intensifications” of affect sharing, where both patient and therapist use emotional phraseology and tone to intensify and solidify the shared empathic connection. Affect sharing is a form of empathy that constitutes its own selfobject experience, with mutative properties that firmly establish empathy as an integral component of therapeutic change.","PeriodicalId":91515,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15551024.2016.1141609","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2016.1141609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

What if the enduring desire of the psychoanalytic discipline to be seen as scientific provoked the suppression of certain therapeutic practices? It would explain why Kohut defined empathy only as a mode of clinical observation when he began discussing it, because even that proposal risked being seen as unscientific and controversial. Today, there exists a more favorable professional atmosphere, which should allow for empathic phenomena to now be included in a theory of cure. Clinical examples in this article demonstrate how “affect sharing” can be used in this way. Affect sharing occurs when the therapist believes he or she is reverberating with the affect the patient feels, resulting from a “sharing” selfobject transference, the aim of which is to elicit a shared emotional state with the therapist. In “descriptive affect sharing,” therapists are encouraged to feel what their patients are feeling when listening to their patients’ evocative descriptions. In “active affect sharing,” an activity introduced by the patient can lead to a shared emotional experience within the analytic dyad. These patient-initiated empathic events are experienced as having been shared when the therapist communicates—verbally or non-verbally, directly or indirectly—that affect sharing has occurred. Incrementally escalating affective communications are defined as “reciprocal intensifications” of affect sharing, where both patient and therapist use emotional phraseology and tone to intensify and solidify the shared empathic connection. Affect sharing is a form of empathy that constitutes its own selfobject experience, with mutative properties that firmly establish empathy as an integral component of therapeutic change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过“情感分享”建立共情的治疗效果
如果精神分析学科被视为科学的持久愿望激起了对某些治疗实践的抑制,那该怎么办?这可以解释为什么科胡特在开始讨论共情时,只把它定义为一种临床观察模式,因为即使这个提议也有被视为不科学和有争议的风险。今天,有一个更有利的专业氛围,这应该允许移情现象现在包括在治疗理论。本文中的临床示例演示了如何以这种方式使用“影响共享”。情感分享发生在治疗师相信他或她正在与患者感受到的情感产生共鸣时,这是“分享”自我客体转移的结果,其目的是引发与治疗师共享的情感状态。在“描述性情感分享”中,治疗师被鼓励去感受他们的病人在听他们的病人的唤起性描述时的感受。在“积极的情感分享”中,患者引入的一项活动可以在分析二分体中导致共享的情感体验。当治疗师口头或非口头、直接或间接地沟通时,这些由患者发起的共情事件被体验为已经被分享了,影响分享已经发生了。逐步升级的情感交流被定义为情感分享的“互惠强化”,患者和治疗师都使用情感措辞和语气来加强和巩固共享的共情联系。情感分享是共情的一种形式,它构成了自身的自我客体体验,具有突变特性,使共情成为治疗变化的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Page EOV Racializing Kohut’s “Guilty Man” and “Tragic Man”: Serious Play in the Service of Inclusiveness The End of Comparative Psychoanalysis? Blurring the Boundaries Between Contemporary Theories From Self-Protection to Relational Protectiveness: The Modification of Defensive Structures The Self as a Process of Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1